Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...

Hybrid Zones

Hybrid Zones

Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.

DNA Microarrays

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

SNaQ.jl: Improved scalability for level-1 phylogenetic network inference.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Phylogenetic networks empower biodiversity research.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Same author

Inference of Phylogenetic Networks From Sequence Data Using Composite Likelihood.

Systematic biology·2024

Same author

Identification of major histocompatibility complex genotypes associated with resistance to an amphibian emerging infectious disease.

Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases·2023

Same author

There and Back Again: The Unexpected Journeys of <i>Metridium</i> de Blainville, 1824 between the Old Oceans and throughout the Modern World.

The Biological bulletin·2023

Same author

A time-calibrated mitogenomic phylogeny suggests that Korean <i>Hyalessa fuscata</i> is a bridge between Chinese and Japanese <i>H</i>.<i>maculaticollis</i>.

Journal of genetics·2023

Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026

Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026

Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026

Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026

Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026

Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

Comparative Performance of Popular Methods for Hybrid Detection using Genomic Data.

Sungsik Kong¹, Laura S Kubatko^1,2

¹Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Systematic Biology

|January 6, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Accurately detecting hybridization using genomic data is challenging. HyDe and the D-statistic effectively detect hybridization, but HyDe provides more robust estimates of parental contributions compared to Structure and ADMIXTURE.

More Related Videos

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Genomics
Population genetics

Background:

Interspecific hybridization is a key driver of genetic variability and species diversity.
Genomic data has advanced hybridization studies beyond simple detection to analyzing hybrid genomic composition.
Accurate detection of hybridization from genomic data remains a significant challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

To comparatively evaluate the performance of four common hybridization detection tools: HyDe, the D-statistic, Structure, and ADMIXTURE.
To assess these methods under various hybridization scenarios, including different times of hybridization, levels of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), and parental contributions.
To compare the statistical power, false discovery rate (FDR), and accuracy of hybrid proportion (gamma) estimates.

Main Methods:

Utilized simulated genomic data to test four popular hybridization inference methods.
Evaluated HyDe and the D-statistic for hybridization detection power and FDR.
Assessed the accuracy of parental contribution (gamma) estimates from HyDe, Structure, and ADMIXTURE using mean squared error.

Main Results:

HyDe and the D-statistic demonstrated high power for detecting hybridization, except in scenarios with substantial ILS.
The D-statistic exhibited a high false discovery rate in some cases.
HyDe provided robust and accurate estimates of parental contributions, while Structure and ADMIXTURE struggled with asymmetric contributions and sometimes failed to identify hybrids.

Conclusions:

HyDe is a reliable method for detecting hybridization and estimating parental contributions, outperforming Structure and ADMIXTURE in accuracy and robustness.
The D-statistic is powerful but requires careful consideration of its false discovery rate.
These findings offer guidance for selecting appropriate methods for identifying hybrid populations in genomic studies.