Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: bridging for implantable defibrillators in left ventricular assist device
Filippos-Paschalis Rorris1, Christos Charitos2
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece. prorris@gmail.com.
Insights
Conflicting data exists on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. Wearable cardioverter defibrillators may help guide decisions on permanent defibrillator implantation in LVAD recipients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are beneficial for heart failure patients, but their efficacy in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients is unclear.
- Lack of randomized controlled trial data leads to conflicting guidelines on routine ICD implantation in LVAD patients.
- Alternative strategies like subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) have limited eligibility for LVAD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current evidence and guidelines regarding ICD use in LVAD patients.
- To explore the potential role of wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) in managing arrhythmia risk in LVAD recipients.
- To address the clinical dilemma of de novo ICD implantation in LVAD candidates.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and societal guidelines on ICD and LVAD therapy.
- Analysis of data regarding the effectiveness and limitations of different defibrillator strategies in LVAD patients.
- Discussion of the emerging role of wearable cardioverter defibrillators as a bridge to decision.
Main Results:
- Current data on ICD benefit in LVAD patients is conflicting, with no clear consensus in major guidelines.
- Subcutaneous ICD eligibility is often insufficient for the LVAD population.
- Wearable cardioverter defibrillators present a potential temporary solution for risk assessment and decision-making.
Conclusions:
- The optimal defibrillator strategy for LVAD patients remains an area of active investigation.
- Wearable cardioverter defibrillators may serve as a valuable tool to guide decisions on permanent defibrillator implantation in LVAD recipients.
- Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to clarify the role of ICDs in LVAD therapy.
Abstract:
There is currently conflicting data available regarding the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. While the benefit of an ICD in heart failure patients is well demonstrated, such benefit has failed to reach the LVAD population. In lack of randomized control trial data on the topic of ICD use in LVAD recipients, major societal guidelines are in disagreement when comes to the topic of routine implantation of a permanent defibrillator in prospective ventricular assist device patients. Alternative permanent defibrillator strategies have been suggested for the LVAD population such as subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) but eligibility of patients for such practice remains disappointing. Although most of the heart failure patients undergoing LVAD implantation already bear an ICD, clinicians are left with the decision of de novo implanting an ICD in an important number of patients. Wearable cardioverter defibrillators could prove beneficial in LVAD recipients by utilizing them as a bridge to decision towards the implantation of a permanent defibrillator.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

