Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

224
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
224
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

987
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
987
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

269
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
269
Bias01:22

Bias

6.6K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

432
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
432
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.7K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter to the Editor Comment on: Subclavian approach without ultrasound guidance is safe and effective for pediatric central venous access.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same author

The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters in Adult Patients With Cancer (MAGIC-ONC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

The prevalence and use of arterial catheters in adult intensive care units: An Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2025
Same author

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2025
Same author

Prospective Observational Study of Pressure-Volume Curves and Respiratory Parameters in Oncology Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia.

AANA journal·2025
Same author

Securing Jugular Central Venous Catheters With Dressings Fixed to a Liquid Adhesive to Prevent Dressing Failure in Intensive Care Patients (the STICKY Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Critical care medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.1K

Misclassification and measurement error - planning a study and interpreting results.

Steven Alfred Frost1, Evan Alexandrou2

  • 1South Western Sydney Local Health District, Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Liverpool BC, New South Wales, Australia.

Nurse Researcher
|January 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Measurement error, including misclassification, can weaken study findings. Understanding its impact helps researchers accurately interpret results and improve study design for more reliable data.

Keywords:
data analysisdata collectionquantitative researchresearchstudy design

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.5K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.1K
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.5K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Research
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Measurement error and misclassification are critical considerations in research planning and interpretation.
  • Nursing research often overlooks the impact of measurement error and misclassification.
  • While bias is discussed, its consequences and mitigation strategies in nursing research require more attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the gap in nurses' research training regarding measurement error.
  • To provide examples of random measurement error, specifically misclassification of binary outcomes in continuous exposure and outcome variables.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses the relationship between exposure and outcome with and without measurement error.
  • Illustrates the use of risk (relative risk) and association (correlation) measures.
  • Presents methods for estimating true risk and association from erroneous clinical measurements.

Main Results:

  • Random measurement error leads to attenuation of risk or association towards the null.
  • Accurate estimation of true risk and association is possible even with measurement error.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding measurement error and misclassification enhances the interpretation of study results.
  • Researchers can improve study quality by accounting for potential measurement errors during planning and execution.