Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.4K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A versatile VLP-mediated CRISPR-RNP platform for precise genome editing and durable epigenome silencing in cancer.

Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids·2026
Same author

Isolation and characterization of <i>Pseudarthrobacter cremeus</i> sp. nov. and <i>Ideonella flava</i> sp. nov. from mountain soil.

International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology·2026
Same author

Developmental and transcriptional programs that define the initiation of the forelimb.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

The effect of temporary dual artery ligation (TDAL) during laparoscopic myomectomy on reducing intraoperative blood loss: a retrospective cohort study.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same author

Improving Radiology Report Error Detection Using a Multipass Large Language Model: Framework Development and Validation.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same author

Ethnicity-specific molecular subtypes and a machine-learning risk model in Asian patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Precision Medicine Gene Network Analyser: part I-cancer driver gene identification through network topology and ensemble machine learning.

Genomics & informatics·2026
Same journal

A bioinformatics pipeline for the design of a SART3-targeted cancer vaccine with enhanced immunogenicity.

Genomics & informatics·2026
Same journal

Measuring the gap: correlating synthetic-to-real drift with PHI de-identification performance.

Genomics & informatics·2026
Same journal

Correction: Towards a transparent and reproducible AI-assisted research paper writing.

Genomics & informatics·2026
Same journal

Correction: Peptide‑based therapeutics targeting the SLC39A14‑PIWIL2 fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Genomics & informatics·2026
Same journal

BioOne: a national-scale platform for integrated discovery and utilization of diverse biological resources in South Korea.

Genomics & informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance
04:58

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance

Published on: December 13, 2024

3.5K

Comparative analysis of commonly used peak calling programs for ChIP-Seq analysis.

Hyeongrin Jeon1, Hyunji Lee1, Byunghee Kang1

  • 1Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea.

Genomics & Informatics
|January 8, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the right ChIP-Seq peak caller is crucial for accurate protein binding site identification. This study found that common peak callers perform similarly for well-defined histone modifications but struggle with low-fidelity marks, impacting results.

Keywords:
ChIP-Seqhistone modificationhuman embryonic stem cellpeak calling program

More Related Videos

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
12:54

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

13.9K
Author Spotlight: Cistrome Analysis in Mouse Muscle Stem Cells
10:10

Author Spotlight: Cistrome Analysis in Mouse Muscle Stem Cells

Published on: July 7, 2023

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance
04:58

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance

Published on: December 13, 2024

3.5K
Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
12:54

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

13.9K
Author Spotlight: Cistrome Analysis in Mouse Muscle Stem Cells
10:10

Author Spotlight: Cistrome Analysis in Mouse Muscle Stem Cells

Published on: July 7, 2023

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics and Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput DNA sequencing (ChIP-Seq) is vital for mapping protein-DNA interactions genome-wide.
  • Accurate identification of protein enrichment sites (peak calling) is essential but challenging with current algorithms.
  • Existing peak callers often fail to precisely explain binding features detected by ChIP-Seq.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of five popular peak calling programs for ChIP-Seq data.
  • To assess peak caller performance across 12 different histone modifications in human embryonic stem cells.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate peak callers for specific histone modification analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized publicly available ChIP-Seq data for 12 histone modifications (H3K4ac/me1/me2/me3, H3K9ac/me3, H3K27ac/me3, H3K36me3, H3K56ac, H3K79me1/me2) from H1 human embryonic stem cells.
  • Compared five peak callers: CisGenome, MACS1, MACS2, PeakSeq, and SISSRs.
  • Evaluated performance based on reproducibility, response to sequencing depth, signal-to-noise ratio, and peak prediction sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • No significant performance differences were observed among peak callers for point-source histone modifications.
  • Peak callers exhibited low performance across all evaluated parameters for low-fidelity histone modifications like H3K4ac, H3K56ac, and H3K79me1/me2.
  • The accuracy of peak positions for low-fidelity marks was compromised, indicating potential limitations in their detection.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of peak caller significantly impacts the accuracy of ChIP-Seq analysis, particularly for low-fidelity histone modifications.
  • Standard peak callers are adequate for well-defined histone modifications but may not be suitable for marks with less distinct binding patterns.
  • This comparative analysis offers valuable insights for researchers to select optimal peak calling strategies based on the specific histone modification under investigation.