Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Intraosseous versus intravenous access while wearing personal protective equipment: a meta-analysis in the era of
Anna Drozd1, Jacek Smereka1,2, Krzysztof J Filipiak3
1Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
Insights
When wearing personal protective equipment (PPE), intraosseous access is faster and more successful than peripheral intravenous access for emergency vascular procedures. This finding is crucial for optimizing patient care in high-risk settings.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Critical Care
- Medical Procedures
Background:
- Vascular access is a critical procedure in emergency care.
- The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the use of full personal protective equipment (PPE) during medical interventions.
- The impact of PPE on vascular access methods in emergency settings required investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of different intravascular access methods in patients requiring vascular access while wearing full PPE.
- To determine the optimal intravascular access strategy for healthcare providers under stringent personal protective equipment (PPE) conditions.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted.
- Searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for relevant RCTs.
- Evaluated procedure duration and success rates for intraosseous and peripheral intravenous access under full PPE.
Main Results:
- Eight RCTs were included in the quantitative synthesis.
- Personal protective equipment (PPE) significantly increased procedure duration for intraosseous access (MD, 11.69s).
- Personal protective equipment (PPE) reduced success rates for both intraosseous (0.8%) and intravenous (10.1%) access.
- Intraosseous access was faster (MD, -41.43s) and more successful than peripheral intravenous access under PPE.
Conclusions:
- Personal protective equipment (PPE) significantly prolongs intravascular procedure times.
- Despite PPE, intraosseous access offers a shorter procedure time and higher success rate compared to peripheral intravenous access.
- Intraosseous access is recommended for emergency vascular procedures when full PPE is required.
Background:
Obtaining vascular access is one of the key procedures performed in patients in emergency settings.
Aims:
The study was conducted as a meta‑analysis and a systematic review and aimed to address the following question: which intravascular access method should be used in patients with COVID‑19 when wearing full personal protective equipment (PPE)?
Methods:
We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials that compared intravascular access methods used by operators wearing full level C PPE. We evaluated procedure duration and the success rate of intraosseous and peripheral intravenous accesses.
Results:
Eight randomized controlled trials were included in quantitative synthesis. The use of PPE during intravascular access procedures had an impact on procedure duration in the case of intraosseous access (mean difference [MD], 11.69; 95% CI, 6.47-16.92; P <0.001), as well as reduced the success rate of intraosseous access by 0.8% and intravenous access by 10.1%. Under PPE conditions, intraosseous access, compared with peripheral intravenous access, offered a shorter procedure time (MD, -41.43; 95% CI, -62.36 to -24.47; P <0.001).
Conclusion:
This comprehensive meta‑analysis suggested that the use of PPE significantly extends the duration of intravascular procedures. However, under PPE conditions, operators were able to obtain intraosseous access in a shorter time and with a higher success rate than in the case of intravenous access.
More Related Videos
09:57A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
09:03Nasal Brushing Sampling and Processing Using Digital High Speed Ciliary Videomicroscopy – Adaptation for the COVID-19 Pandemic
Published on: November 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings I: Donning
Personal Protective Equipment
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...