Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

The Effect of Interfacial Chemical Bonding in TiO2-SiO2 Composites on Their Photocatalytic NOx Abatement Performance
Published on: July 4, 2017
Challenges in quantification of photocatalytic NO2 abatement effectiveness under real world exposure conditions
J M Cordero1, R Hingorani2, E Jimenez-Relinque2
1Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ETSII-UPM), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract:
Health risks due to NO2 exposure commonly exceed acceptable levels in modern societies. Among the measures to reduce such risks, photocatalytic materials present a promising technology. However, while the pollutant remediation of such materials has been extensively validated in laboratory studies, the performance under real world environmental exposure conditions is still subject to controversy. Indeed, a comparison of available in-situ monitoring studies manifests non-conclusive and highly scattered results regarding the photocatalytic effectiveness observed. The reasons for this behaviour must be carefully explored in order to prevent non-efficient photocatalytic applications from being put into practice on a larger scale. This paper presents a comprehensive large-scale study for assessing the photocatalytic NO2 remediation by active pavements in a street of Madrid (Spain), comprising different in-situ monitoring techniques. The discussion is enriched by relating the obtained results to those of other large-scale studies. The discrepancies between these results may be traced back to different circumstances, among them the distance between the active pavement and the pollutant concentration sampling inlet, as well as to significant site-specific and time-dependent variations of pollutant concentrations and climatic parameters. Under due consideration of these influences, for materials with relatively high initial effectiveness, it was concluded that in most such applications, the average NO2 removal effectiveness, if evaluated at a typical inlet height of Air Quality Stations (3 m), will not exceed a value of 4% (averaged over a sufficiently large number of measurement points in the area of application and a sustained amount of time, i.e. several months). When considering more realistic human exposure conditions (lower heights and daytime), it might be justified to assume somewhat higher average effectiveness.
More Related Videos
08:30A Complete Method for Evaluating the Performance of Photocatalysts for the Degradation of Antibiotics in Environmental Remediation
Published on: October 6, 2022
08:23Analyzing the Photo-oxidation of 2-propanol at Indoor Air Level Concentrations Using Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Published on: June 14, 2018