Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
Published on: July 30, 2019
Sex-specific plasticity in a trophic polymorphic aquatic predator: a modeling approach
Tomas O Höök1, Richard Svanbäck2, Peter Eklöv3
1Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA. thook@purdue.edu.
Phenotypic plasticity varies between male and female Eurasian perch due to sex-specific selection pressures. This study reveals that genetically determined plasticity potential can evolve differently between sexes, impacting morphological variation.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Ecology
- Animal behavior
Background:
- Phenotypic plasticity, the ability of an organism to change its phenotype in response to environmental changes, is widespread in animals.
- Sexual size dimorphism, where males and females differ in size, is also common and thought to result from sex-specific fitness trade-offs.
- The genetic basis of plasticity suggests its potential magnitude can vary individually, and potentially between sexes due to differential selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if differential selection on males and females can lead to unequal genetically determined plasticity potential.
- To evaluate this hypothesis in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis), a species with known sexual size dimorphism and habitat-related plasticity.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 500-year simulations of an ecogenetic agent-based model to explore the evolution of plasticity potential.
- Incorporated sex-specific life-history differences and varying costs of plasticity (growth and survival) into the model.
- Conducted in situ morphological analyses of Eurasian perch to compare with model predictions.
Main Results:
- The model demonstrated that genetically determined morphological plasticity potential can evolve differently between male and female Eurasian perch.
- This divergence in plasticity potential led to greater realized morphological variation between habitats for one sex compared to the other.
- In situ morphological data supported model predictions, showing greater realized morphological variation between habitats for females than males.
Conclusions:
- Sex-specific selective pressures can drive the evolution of unequal genetically defined plasticity potential between males and females.
- Differences in plasticity potential between sexes may be a common evolutionary feature across diverse animal taxa.
- This study highlights the complex interplay between genetics, environment, and sex in shaping phenotypic variation.
More Related Videos
08:33Experimental Protocol for Examining Behavioral Response Profiles in Larval Fish: Application to the Neuro-stimulant Caffeine
Published on: July 24, 2018
12:24Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
Published on: August 29, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Trophic Efficiency