Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

100
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
100
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.8K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.1K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.1K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

849
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
849
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

64.0K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
64.0K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

198
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
198

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can Childhood be Used as a Model to Understand the Effects of Psychedelics?

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Learning for the Long Run: Children Increasingly Prioritize Generalizable Knowledge in Tool Selection.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Differences in causal reasoning in preschool-aged children with and without autism.

Child development·2026
Same author

How barriers become invisible: Children are less sensitive to constraints that are stable over time.

Developmental science·2024
Same author

Thinking Structurally: A Cognitive Framework for Understanding How People Attribute Inequality to Structural Causes.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2022
Same author

Ask me why, don't tell me why: Asking children for explanations facilitates relational thinking.

Developmental science·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.8K

Thinking Counterfactually Supports Children's Evidence Evaluation in Causal Learning.

Jae Engle1,2, Caren M Walker1

  • 1University of California, San Diego.

Child Development
|January 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Counterfactual thinking helps young children evaluate evidence and choose the best explanation, especially when new information conflicts with their existing beliefs. This strategy is more effective than simply explaining the situation.

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.7K
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

34.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.8K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.7K
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

34.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Causal Reasoning

Background:

  • Learners often face ambiguous evidence supporting multiple potential causes.
  • Discriminating between competing hypotheses is a key aspect of cognitive development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if counterfactual thinking aids 5-year-olds in selecting between competing causal hypotheses.
  • To compare the effectiveness of counterfactual prompts versus a related explanatory scaffold.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted with 120 five-year-old children.
  • Experiment 1: Assessed if counterfactuals improve evidence evaluation for competing causes.
  • Experiment 2: Examined counterfactuals against prior beliefs when evidence conflicted.

Main Results:

  • Counterfactuals supported evidence evaluation, leading children to favor causes explaining more data.
  • When hypotheses conflicted with prior beliefs, counterfactuals led children to privilege data-supported hypotheses.
  • Children using explanation relied more on pre-existing beliefs.

Conclusions:

  • Counterfactual thinking directs attention to crucial, disambiguating evidence.
  • Counterfactual prompts are more effective than explanation when new evidence challenges existing beliefs in young learners.