Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Detectability of foreign body materials using X-ray, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: A phantom
Jan Oliver Voss1, Christian Doll2, Jan D Raguse3
1Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany.
Purpose:
To evaluate the effectiveness of plain radiography (X-ray. XR), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MR) in visualising commonly seen foreign bodies. A special focus was put on objects relevant to head and neck surgery.
Method:
Thirty-four commonly encountered objects of different compositions including wood, plastic, and glass were embedded in a gelatin gel phantom and imaged using XR, CT and MR. The success rates of radiologists in detecting and correctly identifying the foreign objects were evaluated. Subjective visibility was rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Objective visibility was analysed using region of interest-based contrast for CT.
Results:
Sensitivity in foreign bodies detection was highest in MR (97.1 %) followed by CT (86.0 %) and x-ray (61.8 %). Success rates for the correct identification of the objects and material types were highest in MR (33.3 % and 39.2 %, respectively) followed by CT (25.5 % for both) and XR (16.7 % and 15.7 %). Overall, subjective visibility was rated higher in CT and MR imaging ("good visibility"), as compared to XR ("poor visibility"). Interreader agreement was high across modalities (Kendall's W = 0.935, 0.834 and 0.794 for XR, MR and CT, respectively).
Conclusions:
Detection and identification of non-ferromagnetic objects was most successful in MR followed by CT imaging in this experimental setup.
More Related Videos
04:55Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
08:19Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
Published on: May 17, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:24Magnetic Resonance Imaging
01:24X-ray Imaging
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
01:27Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging