Fibrinogen performs better than D-dimer for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a meta-analysis of

Liping Pan1, Hao Wu1, Heng Liu1

  • 1Department of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, XiCheng District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Insights

Fibrinogen demonstrates higher specificity than D-dimer for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This meta-analysis indicates fibrinogen is a more reliable rule-in diagnostic marker for PJI, though further trials are recommended.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Diagnostic Medicine

Background:

  • Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis remains challenging.
  • Coagulation parameters like D-dimer and fibrinogen have shown potential but controversial utility.
  • This study synthesizes evidence to compare their diagnostic accuracy for PJI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic accuracies of D-dimer and fibrinogen for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
  • To evaluate their performance as diagnostic tools for PJI using meta-analysis.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase) up to March 2020.
  • Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, evaluating pooled sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.
  • Diagnostic performance differences between D-dimer and fibrinogen were analyzed using Z test statistics.

Main Results:

  • Fibrinogen showed a pooled specificity of 0.85 and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.12 for PJI.
  • D-dimer had a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.77.
  • Fibrinogen's specificity was significantly higher than D-dimer's (p=0.03), indicating better rule-in performance.

Conclusions:

  • Fibrinogen performs better than D-dimer as a rule-in diagnostic tool for PJI due to its significantly higher specificity.
  • While fibrinogen shows promise, further large-scale prospective trials are necessary for definitive confirmation.
  • This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the diagnostic utility of coagulation markers in PJI.

Related Concept Videos

Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:20

Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

The key difference between Superficial Vein Thrombosis (SVT) and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) lies in their location and severity.Clinical ManifestationsSVT typically presents with localized pain, tenderness, and redness along the course of a superficial vein, often accompanied by a palpable, cord-like structure under the skin. This condition is usually less dangerous than DVT but can be uncomfortable and may lead to complications such as cellulitis or, rarely, a clot extension into the deep...
126
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care01:29

Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

Venous thrombosis requires effective prevention and treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential complications.Prevention StrategiesHealthcare providers must prioritize preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) for all adult patients upon admission. Interventions depend on bleeding and thrombosis risk, medical history, current medications, diagnoses, planned procedures, and patient preferences. Patients on bed rest should change positions every two hours and, if not...
119