Fibrinogen performs better than D-dimer for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a meta-analysis of diagnostic trials
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Liping Pan1, Hao Wu1, Heng Liu1
1Department of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, XiCheng District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Purpose:
D-dimer and fibrinogen, both belonging to coagulation parameters, are controversial for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This meta-analysis was conducted to compare their diagnostic accuracies for PJI by synthesizing currently available evidence.
Methods:
Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase up to March 1, 2020, and other relevant articles were searched. Five hundred and eighty-one articles were identified after initial research, and 11 studies were included finally. No threshold effects were found between studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio were reported to evaluate the diagnostic performance with heterogeneity analysis. Z test statistics was used to analyze the difference of diagnostic performance between D-dimer and fibrinogen.
Results:
The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio of D-dimer for PJI were 0.79 (95% [CI], 0.72-0.85), 0.77 (0.67-0.84), 3.38 (2.21-5.18), and 0.27 (0.18-0.41), respectively. As for fibrinogen, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio for PJI were 0.75 (0.68-0.80), 0.85 (0.82-0.88), 5.12 (4.22-6.22), and 0.30 (0.23-0.37), respectively. Great heterogeneity was found in studies for D-dimer, and univariate meta-regression analysis revealed that number of involved joints, disease spectrum, comorbidities influencing D-dimer, and sample sources were the source of heterogeneity. Z test found that the pooled specificity of fibrinogen was significantly higher than D-dimer (0.85 ± 0.01 versus 0.77 ± 0.04, p = 0.03). The pooled positive likelihood ratio of fibrinogen was significantly higher than D-dimer (5.12 ± 0.51 versus 3.38 ± 0.74, p = 0.03).
Conclusion:
Based on currently available evidence, the meta-analysis suggests that fibrinogen performs better than D-dimer as a rule-in diagnostic tool for its higher specificity. However, more prospective trials with larger size are still needed to provide further confirmation.
Trial Registration:
This meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews), and the registering number was CRD42020177176 .
Insights
Fibrinogen demonstrates higher specificity than D-dimer for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This meta-analysis indicates fibrinogen is a more reliable rule-in diagnostic marker for PJI, though further trials are recommended.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Medicine
Background:
- Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis remains challenging.
- Coagulation parameters like D-dimer and fibrinogen have shown potential but controversial utility.
- This study synthesizes evidence to compare their diagnostic accuracy for PJI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracies of D-dimer and fibrinogen for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
- To evaluate their performance as diagnostic tools for PJI using meta-analysis.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase) up to March 2020.
- Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, evaluating pooled sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.
- Diagnostic performance differences between D-dimer and fibrinogen were analyzed using Z test statistics.
Main Results:
- Fibrinogen showed a pooled specificity of 0.85 and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.12 for PJI.
- D-dimer had a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.77.
- Fibrinogen's specificity was significantly higher than D-dimer's (p=0.03), indicating better rule-in performance.
Conclusions:
- Fibrinogen performs better than D-dimer as a rule-in diagnostic tool for PJI due to its significantly higher specificity.
- While fibrinogen shows promise, further large-scale prospective trials are necessary for definitive confirmation.
- This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the diagnostic utility of coagulation markers in PJI.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

