Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A swab and wetting agent combination investigation for enhanced touch DNA recovery: A step towards standardisation.

International journal of legal medicine·2026
Same author

Using hierarchical Bayesian modelling to assess shedder test suitability.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same author

Probabilistic searching of databases compared to binary CODIS eligibility: An improved methodology for maximizing investigative leads using short tandem repeat DNA profiles.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same author

deepNoC: A deep learning system to assign the number of contributors to a short tandem repeat DNA profile.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same author

A matter of age: Investigation of the ability to classify epithelial cells of different anatomical origin in aged samples using imaging flow cytometry.

Forensic science international·2026
Same author

Influences of oils on the persistence and recovery of DNA.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes
08:35

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Published on: July 17, 2021

22.2K

How many cells are required for successful DNA profiling?

Piyamas Kanokwongnuwut1, Belinda Martin1, Duncan Taylor2

  • 1College of Science & Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia.

Forensic Science International. Genetics
|January 10, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Forensic DNA profiling requires fewer buccal cells (≥40) with direct PCR than corneocytes from touch samples. DNA extraction workflows increase cellular requirements for both sample types, informing forensic sample triage.

Keywords:
CorneocytesDNA collectionSTR DNA profilingSalivaTouch DNA

More Related Videos

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

16.4K
Identifying DNA Mutations in Purified Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells
11:06

Identifying DNA Mutations in Purified Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells

Published on: February 24, 2014

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes
08:35

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Published on: July 17, 2021

22.2K
Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

16.4K
Identifying DNA Mutations in Purified Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells
11:06

Identifying DNA Mutations in Purified Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells

Published on: February 24, 2014

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Advances in fluorescent nucleic acid dye staining enable targeted collection of cellular material from touch and saliva deposits.
  • Determining the minimum cell number for informative DNA profiles is crucial for forensic investigations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish the cellular threshold requirements for generating DNA profiles from touch and saliva samples using different collection and processing methods.
  • To correlate DNA quantification and profile data with the number of cells collected to optimize forensic workflows.

Main Methods:

  • Diamond™ Nucleic Acid Dye (DD) staining and portable fluorescence microscopy were used to visualize and target cells.
  • Cellular material was collected using swabs and tapelifts from touch and saliva samples.
  • Samples were processed via direct PCR and PCR post-extraction to generate DNA profiles.

Main Results:

  • Full DNA profiles were consistently generated with direct PCR using ≥40 buccal cells (swab or tapelift).
  • Touch samples required ≥800 corneocytes (swab) or ≥4,000 (tapelift) for direct PCR.
  • DNA extraction workflows increased requirements to ≥80 buccal cells and ≥4,000-8,000 corneocytes for touch samples.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides data for informed sample triage and workflow decisions in forensic DNA analysis.
  • Visual quantification of stained cells aids in optimizing STR amplification based on sample type and collection method.