Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Modeling multi-level survival data in multi-center epidemiological cohort studies: Applications from the ELAPSE
Evangelia Samoli1, Sophia Rodopoulou1, Ulla A Hvidtfeldt2
1Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Str, 115 27 Athens, Greece.
Accounting for cohort differences is crucial when analyzing multi-level survival data from pooled studies on air pollution and health outcomes. Failing to adjust for cohort effects can significantly alter results, highlighting the importance of robust statistical methods.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Public Health
Background:
- The ELAPSE project pooled data from 14 cohorts to study associations between residential exposure to low levels of air pollution (PM2.5 and NO2) and health outcomes.
- Health outcomes investigated included natural-cause mortality and incidence of cerebrovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare different statistical methods for analyzing multi-level survival data in multi-center epidemiological studies.
- To assess the impact of accounting for different levels of clustering (cohort and small residential areas) on effect estimates.
Main Methods:
- Five approaches were applied within a multivariable Cox model to handle cohort-level clustering: no adjustment, indicator variables, strata, frailty terms, and random intercepts.
- Second-level clustering due to residential area characteristics was addressed using random intercepts or variance correction.
- Simulations were conducted to evaluate the stratified, frailty, and mixed Cox models under various heterogeneity scenarios.
Main Results:
- Effect estimates remained stable when adjusting for cohorts but varied significantly when no adjustment was made.
- Adjusting for small area grouping increased standard errors of effect estimates.
- Simulations showed identical results for stratified and frailty models, supporting their reliability.
Conclusions:
- It is essential to account for between-cohort heterogeneity in multi-center studies using pooled individual-level data.
- A stratified multivariable Cox model was selected for the ELAPSE project to manage cohort heterogeneity, given the study's data limitations.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Cancer Survival Analysis

