Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

849
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
849
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.4K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.9K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.9K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

454
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
454

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rooks (Corvus frugilegus) can show spontaneous vocal flexibility when exposed to dynamically changing rhythmic sounds.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

Hidden hematological, biochemical and immune costs of asymptomatic malaria infections in semi-wild chimpanzees.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Cow factors to address when performing avoidance distance tests at the feeding rack.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2025
Same author

The shifting shelf task: a new, non-verbal measure for attentional set shifting.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Impact of the line of treatment on progression-free survival in patients treated with T-DM1 for metastatic breast cancer.

BMC cancer·2021
Same author

Sustainable laser-based technology for insect pest control.

Scientific reports·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.4K

Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity.

A Romain1, M-H Broihanne2, A De Marco3,4

  • 1Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|January 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Great apes and monkeys show varying abilities to manage decision-making under ambiguity. Chimpanzees and orangutans demonstrate advanced cognitive skills in assessing unpredictable outcomes, unlike other primates.

Keywords:
apesconditional probabilitydecision-makinggamblingmonkeysrisk

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.4K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.7K

Area of Science:

  • Comparative Psychology
  • Primate Cognition
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Decision-making under risk (known probabilities) is well-studied, but managing ambiguity (unknown probabilities) presents greater cognitive challenges.
  • Animals, including humans, generally prefer predictable outcomes and avoid ambiguity, suggesting a need for advanced cognitive skills to navigate uncertainty.
  • Understanding how different primate species handle ambiguity is crucial for insights into the evolution of economic behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare decision-making strategies in capuchins, macaques, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and bonobos in both risky and ambiguous choice contexts.
  • To investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying primate choices when faced with varying levels of outcome predictability.
  • To explore the evolutionary origins of economic behavior by examining how non-human primates manage uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects participated in a gambling task where they could exchange a medium food item for potential rewards from lotteries with visible (risky) or covered (ambiguous) outcomes.
  • The level of ambiguity varied, from fully unknown to partially predictable outcomes under covers.
  • Gambling rates and choices were analyzed across different species and conditions to assess their decision-making strategies.

Main Results:

  • No primate species avoided gambling in ambiguous lotteries; gambling rates increased when at least two large rewards were visible.
  • Capuchins and bonobos largely ignored covered items, while gorillas and macaques considered their potential presence.
  • Chimpanzees and orangutans demonstrated the ability to accurately estimate the value of covered rewards and integrated this with visible information, akin to human conditional probability assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Chimpanzees and orangutans exhibit sophisticated cognitive abilities in managing decision-making under ambiguity, integrating multiple sources of information to form expectations.
  • This study provides the first evidence in non-human primates for complex rule integration in unpredictable environments, suggesting advanced cognitive processing.
  • The findings highlight the capacity of non-human primates to deal with outcome uncertainty, offering key insights into the evolutionary roots of economic decision-making.