Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025
Author Spotlight: Epimysial Electrode Fabrication and Testing in ACL Injury Studies
Published on: April 12, 2024
Variation in Use of Electrodiagnostic Testing: Analysis From the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality
Jessica I Billig1, Sandra V Kotsis2, Kevin C Chung2
1VA/National Clinician Scholars Program, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Purpose:
To evaluate factors that predict the use of electrodiagnostic testing (EDS) for patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR).
Methods:
In this cohort study, we analyzed 553 patients who underwent primary CTR from 8 practices between July 1, 2019 and December 1, 2019 by 32 surgeons in the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality in Surgery (M-CHIQS). The M-CHIQS is a collaborative initiative aimed at improving quality in hand surgery. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including the 6-item carpal tunnel symptoms scale (CTS-6) scores and EDS timing. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess practice and surgeon variation in EDS use related to clinical diagnostic criteria.
Results:
Of the 553 patients who underwent CTR during the study period, 461 (83.3%) received preoperative EDS. After controlling for patient clinical and demographic characteristics, CTS-6 scores were not associated with receiving any preoperative EDS (lower probability of CTS: odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.59-1.51), preconsultation EDS (low probability of CTS: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.73-1.38), or postconsultation EDS (low probability of CTS, OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.77-1.60). For use of any EDS, 9.3% of the variation in testing was explained at the practice level and 31.1% of the variation in testing was explained at the surgeon level.
Conclusions:
Variation in EDS use is explained primarily at the practice and surgeon levels and is not related to patient clinical criteria. We recommend that providers and practices assess their use of preoperative EDS and limit its use to patients with an unclear clinical CTS diagnosis, as stated in current clinical practice guidelines. Likewise, providers should be encouraged to use the CTS-6 before prescribing EDS.
Clinical Relevance:
Limiting the use of EDS to patients with an unclear clinical diagnosis of CTS will reduce costs and improve patient care by eliminating the discomfort and time associated with this test.
