Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

74
Body:The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
74
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

1.4K
Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
1.4K
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

65
The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...
65
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence01:17

Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence

97
Body:Bioequivalence studies are crucial in evaluating whether new drugs can match an approved one regarding pharmacological effects and clinical performance. These studies test if drugs, despite different dosage forms, share identical plasma concentration-time profiles. Three types of equivalence are central to these studies: chemical, pharmaceutical, and therapeutic. Chemical equivalence indicates that two or more drug products contain identical active ingredients in equal amounts.
97
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

81
Body:In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
81
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

74
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
74

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative effectiveness of long-term anti-obesity medications in routine clinical practice: a retrospective cohort study using real-world data.

Translational and clinical pharmacology·2026
Same author

Serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels in healthy Korean men aged 19-40 years: a cross-sectional analysis of reference ranges and seasonal variation.

Translational and clinical pharmacology·2025
Same author

The superiority of likelihood-based confidence interval for variance estimation in a single group.

Translational and clinical pharmacology·2025
Same author

A Comparison of the Charlson and Elixhauser Methods for Predicting Nursing Indicators in Gastrectomy with Gastric Cancer Patients.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Likelihood interval for nonlinear regression.

Translational and clinical pharmacology·2023
Same author

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Bazedoxifene and Cholecalciferol: An Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study in Healthy Male Volunteers.

Drug design, development and therapy·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

18.0K

Bioequivalence data analysis.

Gowooni Park1, Hyungsub Kim1, Kyun-Seop Bae1

  • 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.

Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
|January 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This tutorial demonstrates using R for bioequivalence (BE) data analysis, achieving results comparable to SAS®. It highlights R packages "sasLM" and "nlme" as alternatives to SAS® procedures PROC GLM and PROC MIXED, especially for complex models.

Keywords:
GLMMIXEDSAS®nlmesasLM

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

18.1K
Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

18.0K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

18.1K
Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • SAS® is the industry standard for bioequivalence (BE) data analysis.
  • R, a free and open-source software, is underutilized for BE analysis despite its capabilities.
  • A need exists to demonstrate R's utility for BE analysis, ensuring comparability with SAS®.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a tutorial on conducting bioequivalence data analysis using R.
  • To demonstrate how R can generate results comparable to those obtained with SAS®.
  • To guide users in applying R packages for BE analysis, mirroring SAS® procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of SAS® procedures (PROC GLM, PROC MIXED) with R packages ('sasLM', 'nlme').
  • Utilizing 'sasLM' in R for fixed-effects models or balanced data, analogous to SAS® PROC GLM.
  • Employing 'nlme' in R for mixed-effects models with unbalanced data, comparable to SAS® PROC MIXED.

Main Results:

  • Both SAS® PROC GLM and R 'sasLM' yield comparable estimates for fixed-effects models or balanced data.
  • SAS® PROC MIXED and R 'nlme' provide unbiased estimates for mixed-effects models with unbalanced data.
  • R offers a viable, free alternative for bioequivalence data analysis.

Conclusions:

  • R, specifically with packages 'sasLM' and 'nlme', can effectively perform bioequivalence data analysis.
  • R provides a powerful, accessible alternative to SAS® for BE studies, particularly for complex statistical models.
  • This tutorial facilitates the adoption of R in bioequivalence research, promoting reproducible and comparable results.