Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates.

S A Yoder1, R A Brand, D R Pedersen

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|March 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Architecture of the periacetabular trabecular bone.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Impact of a cleaner-burning cookstove intervention on blood pressure in Nicaraguan women.

Indoor air·2012
Same author

Repeated measurement of mechanical properties in viable osteochondral explants following a single blunt impact injury.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine·2011
Same author

Iron dynamics in Al-Cu-Fe quasicrystals and approximants: Mössbauer and neutron experiments.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2011
Same author

Surface vs. fine-wire electrode ensemble-averaged signals during gait.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2010
Same author

A measurement of proximal femur strain with total hip arthroplasty.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2009

Acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty significantly impacts long-term outcomes. Nonanatomic positioning, specifically superior and lateral placement, is linked to substantially higher rates of femoral loosening compared to anatomic placement.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomechanical engineering
  • Medical device design

Background:

  • Loosening of components is a primary long-term complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
  • Multiple surgical and design factors are implicated in THA loosening.
  • The hip's center of rotation is a critical biomechanical determinant of joint load.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between acetabular component position and the incidence of femoral loosening in THA.
  • To determine if nonanatomic hip center placement increases the risk of loosening.

Main Methods:

  • Long-term follow-up study with an average of 9.1 years post-surgery.
  • Utilized logistical regression analysis to evaluate risk factors.
  • Compared loosening rates based on acetabular component placement (anatomic vs. nonanatomic).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significantly higher rates of femoral loosening were observed with superior and lateral acetabular component placement.
  • Nonanatomic hip center positions correlated with increased femoral loosening.
  • Anatomic placement demonstrated a lower incidence of femoral loosening.

Conclusions:

  • Acetabular component positioning is a crucial factor influencing THA longevity.
  • Superior and lateral (nonanatomic) placement of acetabular components increases the risk of femoral loosening.
  • Achieving near-anatomic hip center placement may reduce the incidence of loosening after THA.