Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A critical test of infant pattern preference models.

J L Dannemiller1, B R Stephens

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

Child Development
|February 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teamwork behaviours and errors during neonatal resuscitation.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same author

Asymmetries in contrast polarity processing in young human infants.

Journal of vision·2003
Same author

Contrast discrimination under temporally varying contrast conditions.

Perception & psychophysics·2000
Same author

Competition in early exogenous orienting between 7 and 21 weeks.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2000
Same author

Contrast gain control in psychophysical contrast discrimination.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

Temporal modulation enhances the efficiency of spatial offset discriminations by 6-month-olds.

Vision research·1998
Same journal

Reciprocal relations between parent-adolescent closeness and adolescent depressive symptoms across the pre-to-post COVID-19 pandemic.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Young children use conversational timing as a cue for prosocial commitment.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Timing and type of domestic violence exposure and adolescents' experiences of peer violence.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Comprehension of "can" predicts performance on a nonverbal measure of modal concepts at 48 but not 36 months.

Child development·2026
Same journal

An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort.

Child development·2026
Same journal

If moms do it, it can't be that important: Children's reasoning about gender disparities in domestic work.

Child development·2026
See all related articles

Infant visual preferences for faces emerge by 12 weeks, contradicting early models. This study demonstrates an unambiguous face preference in infants, suggesting a developmental shift in visual perception.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental psychology
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Infant perception

Background:

  • Current models of infant visual preference rely on physical pattern attributes.
  • Previous research has not definitively demonstrated an innate face preference in early infancy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate existing models of infant visual preference.
  • To investigate the developmental trajectory of face preference in human infants.
  • To identify the determinants of visual preference in early development.

Main Methods:

  • Presented 6- and 12-week-old infants with schematic faces and abstract patterns.
  • Manipulated stimuli based on contrast reversals to test physical attribute models.
  • Recorded infant visual preferences between paired stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Infant preferences at 6 weeks aligned with predictions based on physical attributes.
  • At 12 weeks, infants showed a clear preference for facelike images, violating model predictions.
  • This study provides the first unambiguous evidence of face preference in young infants.

Conclusions:

  • Existing stimulus-based models of visual preference are insufficient.
  • A significant developmental change in visual preference determinants occurs between 6 and 12 weeks.
  • Infant face recognition may involve more than simple physical feature detection.