Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025
Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Optokinetic Response As Structural and Functional Visual System Readouts in Mice and Rats
Published on: January 10, 2019
Retinal Neurodegeneration in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy by Optical Coherence Tomography: A Systematic Review and
Baijing Liu1, Wei Wang2, Rouxi Zhou3
1Department of Pain, The 1st People's Hospital of Chenzhou City, Nanhua University, Hunan, Chenzhou, China.
Purpose:
The optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been used to evaluate the changes of retinal degeneration in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in recent years, but the results of previous studies were controversial. Therefore, systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the degree of retinal neurodegeneration in DPN measured by OCT.
Methods:
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, China Biomedical Literature (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wanfang databases were performed to identify studies that evaluate retinal neurodegeneration in DPN by using OCT. The included studies were critically reviewed and meta-analyses were performed to evaluate differences of the OCT-derived parameters between the DPN and non-DPN patients.
Results:
Twelve studies were included in the final meta-analysis, involving a total of 1,807 eyes (573 in the DPN group and 1,229 in the non-DPN group). The mean peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness was significantly lower in the DPN group than in the non-DPN group (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -8.37 μm; 95% CI: -11.00, -5.74). The reduction of pRNFL thickness was the most pronounced in the inferior quadrant, and the differences in the nasal and temporal quadrants were also statistically significant, with WMD (95% CI) being -4.63 μm (-7.51, -1.76) and -3.92 μm (-6.86, -0.98), respectively. Similar results were observed for macular parameters, with WMD and 95% CI being -1.0 μm (-1.5, -0.5) for macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), -2.7 μm (-10.7, -5.3) for macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL), and -2.2 μm (-4.4, -0.04) for macular ganglion cell complex (mGCC), respectively.
Conclusions:
Patients with DPN present with significant retinal neurodegeneration, with reduced pRNFL, mRNFL, mGCIPL, and mGCC thickness. Measurements of OCT parameters may serve as a biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring DPN.
