Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

645
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
645
Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

42.1K
The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
42.1K
Hearing01:31

Hearing

55.5K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
55.5K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

792
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
792
Sound Intensity Level00:53

Sound Intensity Level

4.6K
Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
4.6K
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

49.0K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
49.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spectral peak picking improves tactile speech perception.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Sensory unpleasantness of very-high frequency sound and audible ultrasound.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2024
Same author

Improved tactile speech perception and noise robustness using audio-to-tactile sensory substitution with amplitude envelope expansion.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Improved tactile speech robustness to background noise with a dual-path recurrent neural network noise-reduction method.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Improved tactile speech perception using audio-to-tactile sensory substitution with formant frequency focusing.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Improving speech perception for hearing-impaired listeners using audio-to-tactile sensory substitution with multiple frequency channels.

Scientific reports·2023
Same journal

A tri-axis optomechanical accelerometer with plasmonic MIM waveguide and structural direction-dependent optical signatures.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Holographic leaky-wave antennas with independently controlled multiple counter-rotating vortex beams.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Differential associations of longitudinal hearing and vision trajectories with dementia and mild cognitive impairment in older adults.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Abdominal obesity and leisure-time sedentary behavior in relation to gastroesophageal reflux disease risk: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Effect of nitrogen-rich COF incorporation on the structure and separation performance of polyamide nanofiltration membranes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Withanolide A inhibits hIAPP aggregation: An In silico, biophysical, and drosophila-based In vivo validation.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

13.0K

Sensitivity to haptic sound-localisation cues.

Mark D Fletcher1,2, Jana Zgheib3, Samuel W Perry3,4

  • 1University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. M.D.Fletcher@soton.ac.uk.

Scientific Reports
|January 12, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Wrist haptic stimulation effectively aids sound localization for hearing-impaired individuals, particularly using intensity differences, which remain sensitive even with aging. This technology offers potential for enhanced virtual reality and robotics.

More Related Videos

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

638
Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test
06:00

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test

Published on: September 17, 2021

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

13.0K
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

638
Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test
06:00

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test

Published on: September 17, 2021

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Haptic Technology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Hearing aid and cochlear implant (CI) users face challenges in sound localization and segregation.
  • Auditory cues like interaural time and intensity differences are crucial for sound localization.
  • Previous research indicated haptic stimulation on wrists can improve sound localization for CI users.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate wrist sensitivity to temporal and intensity sound localization cues.
  • To determine the robustness of this sensitivity to aging.
  • To compare haptic cue sensitivity with existing auditory cues and CI capabilities.

Main Methods:

  • Participants received haptic stimulation on each wrist to simulate interaural time and intensity differences.
  • Sensitivity to these cues was tested across various stimulation intensities and frequencies.
  • Performance was compared between younger and older participants, and with normal-hearing individuals' across-ear sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • Across-wrist time difference sensitivity was significantly poorer than across-ear sensitivity and declined with age.
  • High sensitivity to across-wrist intensity differences was observed, unaffected by age.
  • The dynamic range for wrist haptic stimulation was approximately four times larger than for CIs.

Conclusions:

  • Wrist-based haptic intensity cues offer a robust and sensitive method for sound localization, suitable for hearing-impaired individuals.
  • This technology has potential applications in enhancing virtual reality and remote control systems.
  • Further research can explore optimizing haptic feedback for improved auditory perception and human-machine interaction.