Somatization, paranoia, and language

Somatization and paranoia are circumscribed distortions of reality that are impervious to the normative process of consensual validation. These distortions are often postulated as a means of bolstering lowered self-esteem. We used computerized content analysis of the free speech of patients with these disorders in order to identify and compare dimensions of self-concept reflected in their lexical choices. Interestingly, patients with these disorders differed in the themes prominent in their speech. The higher frequency categories used by the somatization disorder group conveyed an overwhelming sense of negativism, distress, and a preoccupation with an uncertain self-identity. In contrast, the categories used by the paranoid patients portrayed an artificially positive, grandiose self-image and a defensive abstractness. Our exploratory analysis suggests that circumscribed distortions of reality in somatization and paranoid disorders are not associated with the same common defensive style attempting to bolster self-esteem.