Comparison of bronchoscopy and computed tomography-guided needle biopsy for re-biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer

Hirohisa Kano1, Toshio Kubo2, Kiichiro Ninomiya1

  • 1Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1, Kita-ku, Shikata-cho, Okayama City, Okayama, Japan.

Respiratory Investigation
|January 13, 2021
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Computed tomography-guided needle biopsy (CTNB) offers higher diagnostic rates for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) re-biopsy. However, bronchoscopy may be preferred due to lower complication risks like pneumothorax.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonology
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has improved with new drugs.
  • Drug resistance necessitates re-biopsy to identify resistance mechanisms.
  • Optimal re-biopsy techniques (bronchoscopy vs. CTNB) for NSCLC remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic rates and complication profiles of bronchoscopy and CTNB for NSCLC re-biopsy.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different re-biopsy methods in NSCLC patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 79 NSCLC re-biopsies (bronchoscopy or CTNB) from January 2014 to December 2016.
  • Comparison of diagnostic yield and complication rates between the two procedures.

Main Results:

  • CTNB achieved a 100% diagnostic rate compared to 83.7% for bronchoscopy (p=0.023).
  • CTNB had a higher complication rate (36.7%) versus bronchoscopy (18.4%) (p=0.11).
  • Pneumothorax occurred significantly more with CTNB (23.3%) than bronchoscopy (0%) (p<0.01), requiring drainage in 6.7% of CTNB cases.

Conclusions:

  • CTNB offers superior diagnostic accuracy for NSCLC re-biopsy.
  • Bronchoscopy presents a lower risk of complications, particularly pneumothorax.
  • Individual patient factors should guide the choice between CTNB and bronchoscopy for NSCLC re-biopsy.