Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Nasal Brushing Sampling and Processing Using Digital High Speed Ciliary Videomicroscopy – Adaptation for the COVID-19 Pandemic
Published on: November 7, 2020
Work of a paediatric bioethics centre during the COVID-19 pandemic first phase
Joe Brierley1, Sarah Aylett2, Anne MacNiven2
1Paediatric Bioethics Centre, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK joe.brierley@gosh.nhs.uk.
Insights
A children's hospital bioethics team supported families and clinicians through ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, offering case reviews, staff support, and research on pediatric ethics. This work aimed to mitigate moral injury and improve decision-making processes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Pediatric Bioethics
- Public Health Crises
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented ethical dilemmas in healthcare, including resource allocation, patient care duties, and staff well-being.
- Ethical controversies arose concerning intensive care unit (ICU) rationing, patient transfers, and the provision of care with inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE).
- Children's hospitals faced unique ethical challenges in supporting pediatric patients, families, and healthcare professionals during the crisis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the practical functions and support provided by a pediatric hospital bioethics team during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- To offer insights for planning ethics support services in similar healthcare settings facing public health emergencies.
- To address criticisms of ethics support and highlight its crucial role in navigating complex medical and ethical decisions.
Main Methods:
- The study outlines a three-phase approach: preparation, activity, and reflection.
- Preparation involved creating guidance documents for hospital teams and adapting mechanisms to address workforce moral injury.
- Activity included rapid response case reviews (often via video-conferencing), educational webcasts, staff support (especially for those in adult ICUs), and research on youth perspectives.
- Reflection focused on research regarding redeployment, minimizing moral distress, evaluating remote conferencing for ethical discussions, and the societal role of faith.
Main Results:
- The bioethics team conducted case reviews for severely ill children with COVID-19 and Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS-TS), involving innovative therapies and parental consultations.
- Processes were implemented to protect healthcare staff from moral harm, addressing moral injury and distress.
- Educational and research activities focused on pediatric-specific ethical issues that emerged during the pandemic.
Conclusions:
- The pediatric bioethics team played a vital role in navigating complex ethical decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The team's multifaceted approach, including case reviews, staff support, and research, was essential for children, families, and clinicians.
- The experience highlighted the need for robust ethics support systems in pediatric healthcare, particularly during public health crises.
Objectives:
Decisions with an ethical component have been controversial during the COVID-19 pandemic, whether leaked intensive care unit (ICU)-rationing documents, transfer of people to care-homes to 'protect the National Health Service' or the duty to treat patients despite inadequate personal protective equipment. To counter criticism of ethics per se, and to help those planning ethics support we describe the practical work of a children's hospital bioethics team in supporting children, families and clinicians during this unprecedented period.
Design/Setting:
Three phases of activity: (i) preparation: we composed several documents to support/guide hospital teams and, together with colleagues, provided them to regional inpatient, community and hospice settings. We adapted existing mechanisms to combat workforce moral injury; (ii) activity (March-June 2020): was highest in our rapid response service where children/families consider difficult treatment decisions with medical teams. Education provided 'pandemic webcasts' on decision-making and broader child-health concerns. Staff support was essential, especially for those deployed to overwhelmed local adult ICUs. Research ascertained young people's views on the pandemic; (iii) reflection: focussed on (a) research about future re-deployment to adult services and minimisation of moral distress/injury, (b) remote video-conferencing-parents'/participants' experience/ability to consider complex ethical issues and (c) role of faith/non-faith in society's recovery and children's views.
Main Outcome/Conclusions:
Our bioethics team's role during the pandemic included: case reviews via video-conferencing, many involving innovative therapy for severely unwell children with COVID-19/Paediatric-Inflammatory-Multisystem Syndrome-Temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 together with their parents; processes to protect healthcare staff from moral harm and research/educational activity focused on paediatric-specific ethical arising during the pandemic.
More Related Videos
11:13Collection, Expansion, and Differentiation of Primary Human Nasal Epithelial Cell Models for Quantification of Cilia Beat Frequency
Published on: November 10, 2021
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethics in Research
Nursing Ethical Principles I
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...