Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Integrated cardiovascular risk management programme versus usual care in patients at high cardiovascular risk: an
Suzanne Marchal1, Arnoud Wj van 't Hof2,3,4, Henk Jg Bilo4,5
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands s.marchal@umcutrecht.nl.
Insights
Integrated cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) programs in primary care did not significantly reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP) or low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol in high-risk patients. Further research is needed to enhance CVRM effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- General Practice
Background:
- Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading global cause of mortality.
- Risk factor control in high-risk patients remains suboptimal.
- Integrated multidisciplinary cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) programs are emerging in primary care settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of an integrated CVRM program on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol.
- To compare the effectiveness of integrated CVRM with usual care in high-risk patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational study compared integrated CVRM with usual care in Dutch general practices.
- Patients (40-80 years) at high cardiovascular risk were matched at baseline.
- Primary outcomes included SBP and LDL-cholesterol; secondary outcomes covered CV risk, BMI, lifestyle, and health outcomes over 1 year.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in SBP or LDL-cholesterol were observed between the integrated CVRM and usual care groups after 1 year.
- Secondary outcomes, including 10-year CV risk, BMI, and lifestyle factors, also showed no significant differences.
- The study included 372 patients in the intervention group and 317 in the usual care group.
Conclusions:
- Integrated CVRM delivered in general practice did not demonstrate improved SBP or LDL-cholesterol levels in high-risk patients.
- Current integrated CVRM approaches require further investigation and refinement for enhanced effectiveness.
- Additional research is necessary to optimize cardiovascular risk management strategies in primary care.
Background:
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite the impact of CVDs, risk factors are often insufficiently controlled in patients at high risk. Recently, integrated multidisciplinary cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) programmes have been introduced in primary care.
Aim:
To investigate the effects of a CVRM programme on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol.
Design & Setting:
A prospective observational study was undertaken in patients at high cardiovascular (CV) risk who were aged 40-80 years. Integrated CVRM care was compared with usual care in general practice in the Netherlands.
Method:
Intervention and usual care patients were matched at baseline on age, sex, and presence of CVD. During 1 year of follow-up, patients received integrated or usual CVRM care in general practice. Primary outcomes were SBP and LDL-cholesterol. Secondary outcomes included calculated 10-year CV risk, body mass index (BMI), lifestyle (smoking, physical activity, and dietary habits), medication use, patient satisfaction, healthcare consumption, morbidity, comorbidity, and mortality. Mixed-model analyses were used to assess the outcomes.
Results:
Totals of 372 and 317 patients were included in the intervention and usual care group, respectively. Mean age at baseline was 65.1 years and 66.2 years, respectively, and 42% were female in both groups. After 1 year, no differences were observed in: SBP (137.2 mmHg versus 139.0 mmHg in the intervention and usual care group, respectively); LDL-cholesterol (2.6 mmol/l in both groups); or in any of the secondary outcomes.
Conclusion:
Integrated CVRM care in general practice did not lead to a lower SBP or LDL-cholesterol in patients at high CV risk. Further research is needed to improve CVRM.
More Related Videos
07:51Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management