Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Classification: the great deception.

D F Harrison1

  • 1University of London, England.

The Journal of Otolaryngology
|February 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Oncologic statistics rely on classification systems for comparing cancer patient data globally. However, current head and neck cancer classification systems contain unquantified errors, compromising data reliability and international comparisons.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Development and Implementation of a Cognitive-Based Intervention Aimed at Culturally Diverse Women at Risk for HIV/AIDS.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

HIV transmission risks of females and males in paired partner relationships.

Journal of health and human services administration·2003
Same author

Adolescents' knowledge and beliefs about pregnancy: the impact of "ENABL".

Adolescence·2000
Same author

Relationship dynamics, ethnicity and condom use among low-income women.

Family planning perspectives·2000
Same author

Dual-method use among an ethnically diverse group of women at risk of HIV infection.

Family planning perspectives·1998
Same author

Ethnic differences in sexual decisions and sexual behavior.

Archives of sexual behavior·1998

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Statistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology

Background:

  • Accurate cancer statistics are crucial for comparing disease natural history and treatment outcomes globally.
  • Existing classification systems for head and neck cancers aim to standardize data but have inherent, often unquantified, errors.
  • These deficiencies can significantly impact the validity of international cancer research and clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and highlight the deficiencies in current head and neck cancer classification systems.
  • To assess the significance of these errors on oncologic statistics.
  • To evaluate the comparability of cancer data based on existing classification methodologies.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative review of three head and neck cancer sites.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of classification system deficiencies by an experienced clinician.
  • Assessment of the impact of identified errors on statistical comparisons.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant, unquantified errors were identified within the reviewed cancer classification systems.
    • These deficiencies compromise the reliability of head and neck cancer statistics.
    • The current systems hinder accurate worldwide comparisons of cancer data.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing head and neck cancer classification systems are inadequate for robust international statistical comparisons.
    • While encouraging better data recording, the systems' inherent errors create a precarious foundation for cancer statistics.
    • Improvements in classification methodology are needed to ensure reliable oncologic data.