Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018
Utility of Flow Cytometry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Follow-up Monitoring of Plasma Cell Myeloma
Saurav Chopra1, Timothy Dunham2, Sergei I Syrbu1
1Department of Pathology.
Objectives:
We sought to investigate the clinical utility of flow cytometry (FC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the workup of myeloma.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the reports of bone marrow biopsies received for myeloma evaluation between October 2015 and January 2019.
Results:
A total of 1,708 biopsy specimens from 469 myeloma patients (mean age, 64.5 years [SD, 9.3]; female, 41.4%) were reviewed. Both FC and FISH had comparable detection rates at the time of initial diagnosis (97.6% vs 98.8%) and for follow-up cases (28.6% vs 28.2%). FC and FISH results were concordant in 98.8% of the initial diagnosis cases and 89.6% of the follow-up cases. The FISH-positive (FISH+)/FC-negative (FC-) discordance and FISH-/FC+ discordance occurred among 81 (5.0%) and 87 (5.4%) follow-up cases. In comparison with all concordant cases, FISH+/FC- discordant cases were more likely to have received treatment with daratumumab (P < .05).
Conclusions:
Plasma cell-enriched FISH and FC have comparable abnormal plasma cell detection rates, and approximately 10% of the follow-up cases have discordant FISH and FC results in which residual disease is detected by only one of these modalities. FISH testing should be considered for cases with negative FC, especially in patients who have received treatment with daratumumab or in cases in which there is concern about specimen adequacy.
More Related Videos
07:53Interphase Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Bone Marrow Smears of Multiple Myeloma
Published on: April 15, 2022
05:24Two Flow Cytometric Approaches of NKG2D Ligand Surface Detection to Distinguish Stem Cells from Bulk Subpopulations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: February 21, 2021