Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins02:18

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

18.9K
Intrinsically disordered proteins are a group of proteins that do not fold into specific three-dimensional structures. Their structural flexibility allows them to complement ordered proteins to perform functions that are inaccessible to rigid structures. They are more common in eukaryotes than prokaryotes and may either be exclusively intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins, consisting of a mix of ordered and disordered regions. The absence of a rigid structure in these proteins can be...
18.9K
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins02:18

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

2.5K
2.5K
Intermolecular vs Intramolecular Forces03:00

Intermolecular vs Intramolecular Forces

94.0K
Intermolecular forces (IMF) are electrostatic attractions arising from charge-charge interactions between molecules. The strength of the intermolecular force is influenced by the distance of separation between molecules. The forces significantly affect the interactions in solids and liquids, where the molecules are close together. In gases, IMFs become important only under high-pressure conditions (due to the proximity of gas molecules). Intermolecular forces dictate the physical properties of...
94.0K
Intermolecular Forces03:13

Intermolecular Forces

66.5K
Atoms and molecules interact through bonds (or forces): intramolecular and intermolecular. The forces are electrostatic as they arise from interactions (attractive or repulsive) between charged species (permanent, partial, or temporary charges) and exist with varying strengths between ions, polar, nonpolar, and neutral molecules. The different types of intermolecular forces are ion–dipole, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonds, and dispersion; among these, dipole–dipole, hydrogen...
66.5K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

61.6K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
61.6K
Force and Potential Energy in One Dimension01:13

Force and Potential Energy in One Dimension

6.0K
Force can be calculated from the expression for potential energy, which is a function of position. The component of a conservative force, in a particular direction, equals the negative of the derivative of the corresponding potential energy with respect to the displacement in that direction. For regions where potential energy changes rapidly with displacement, the work done and force is maximum. Also, when force is applied along the positive coordinate axis, the potential energy decreases with...
6.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gel-Based NMR Method for Observing Submicrosecond Protein Dynamics at Atomic Resolution.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

DEEP Phaser: A Deep Learning Tandem Vision Transformer for Fully Automated NMR Phase Correction.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Securing the Future of NMR Metabolomics Reproducibility: A Call for Standardized Reporting.

Analytical chemistry·2025
Same author

Detection of intramolecular protein dynamics on nanosecond-to-microsecond timescales by nanoparticle-assisted NMR spin relaxation (NASR).

Nature protocols·2025
Same author

COLMAR1d2d: Synergistic Combination of 1D with 2D NMR for Enhanced High-Throughput Identification and Quantification of Metabolites in Complex Mixtures.

Analytical chemistry·2025
Same author

Dynamics of Globular Proteins when Interacting with Zwitterionic Silica Nanoparticles by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin Relaxation.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches
07:31

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches

Published on: September 1, 2023

2.8K

Systematic Differences between Current Molecular Dynamics Force Fields To Represent Local Properties of Intrinsically

Lei Yu1, Da-Wei Li2, Rafael Brüschweiler1,2,3

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
|January 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Modern molecular dynamics (MD) force fields struggle to accurately represent intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Incorporating coil library data, as in ff99SBnmr2, significantly improves MD simulations of IDPs, enhancing structural and dynamic insights.

More Related Videos

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

15.8K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Intrinsically Disordered Protein Dynamics Through NMR Relaxation Experiments
09:25

Author Spotlight: Exploring Intrinsically Disordered Protein Dynamics Through NMR Relaxation Experiments

Published on: November 1, 2024

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches
07:31

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches

Published on: September 1, 2023

2.8K
Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

15.8K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Intrinsically Disordered Protein Dynamics Through NMR Relaxation Experiments
09:25

Author Spotlight: Exploring Intrinsically Disordered Protein Dynamics Through NMR Relaxation Experiments

Published on: November 1, 2024

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Biophysics
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) lack stable 3D structures, posing challenges for traditional structural biology methods.
  • Molecular dynamics (MD) force fields are crucial for simulating IDPs but require accurate representation of their conformational flexibility.
  • Existing MD force fields often fail to capture the diverse conformational ensembles of IDPs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of four recent MD force fields (AMBER ff14SB, CHARMM C36m, AMBER ff99SB-disp, AMBER ff99SBnmr2) for IDPs.
  • To compare simulation results with experimental nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) 3J-coupling constants for α-synuclein and amyloid-β.
  • To identify force field characteristics that improve the realistic sampling of IDP local backbone structures.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized experimental NMR 3J-coupling constants of α-synuclein and amyloid-β as a benchmark.
  • Performed extensive MD simulations (276 μs total) on overlapping heptapeptide segments of the proteins.
  • Analyzed the accuracy of computed scalar 3J(HN,Hα)-couplings against experimental data for each force field.

Main Results:

  • Substantial differences in force field performance were observed at the residue level.
  • Most force fields (except ff99SBnmr2) underestimated 3J(HN,Hα)-couplings, indicating poor conformational sampling (underrepresenting β-conformations, overrepresenting α- or PP_II conformations).
  • The ff99SBnmr2 force field, incorporating coil library information, showed significantly improved accuracy (<0.5 Hz error) in predicting 3J(HN,Hα)-couplings.

Conclusions:

  • Incorporating coil library data into MD force fields is essential for accurate simulation of IDPs.
  • The ff99SBnmr2 force field provides more realistic sampling of local backbone dihedral angles for IDPs.
  • This validated methodology enables better understanding of IDP function through improved structural dynamics and thermodynamics insights.