Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

08:21
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
429
Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a
Tessy Luger1, Monika A Rieger2, Rosina Bonsch2
1Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany tessy.luger@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
BMJ Open
|January 14, 2021
Summary
Laparoscopic surgeons experience discomfort from prolonged static postures. This study investigates if active or passive work breaks reduce surgeon discomfort during laparoscopic surgery, aiming to improve well-being and surgical practice.
Area of Science:
- Minimally invasive surgery
- Occupational health
- Surgical ergonomics
Background:
- Laparoscopic surgery offers patient benefits but increases surgeon physical load due to prolonged static and awkward postures.
- This can lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons.
- Organizational interventions like work breaks are being explored to mitigate these risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if passive and active work breaks reduce surgeon discomfort compared to no breaks.
- To compare the effectiveness of active work breaks versus passive work breaks in alleviating discomfort.
- To investigate the impact of work breaks on surgeon well-being and performance during laparoscopic procedures.
Main Methods:
- A controlled, randomized cross-over trial involving 21 laparoscopic surgeons.
- Three experimental conditions: no breaks, 2.5-minute passive breaks, and 2.5-minute active breaks (mobility/stretching).
- Primary outcome: rating of perceived discomfort; secondary outcomes: performance, muscle activity, physiological measures, and workload.
Main Results:
- Data analysis will utilize repeated-measures analysis of variance.
- The study protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement.
- Ethical approval obtained from the local medical ethical committee (no 618/2018BO2).
Conclusions:
- Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
- Results will inform future feasibility studies on ergonomic interventions for surgeons.
- This research aims to provide evidence-based strategies for reducing surgeon discomfort in laparoscopic surgery.

