Prediction of Bleeding in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Using Clinical Characteristics and Prospective Coagulation Test

Jessica M Harris1, Karen Sheehan2, Chris A Rogers1

  • 1Bristol Trials Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Insights

Prospective coagulation testing slightly improves prediction of bleeding concerns (CCB) in pediatric cardiac surgery patients. However, the clinical impact is minimal compared to using clinical factors alone.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
  • Coagulation Medicine
  • Clinical Prediction Modeling

Background:

  • Bleeding due to coagulopathy is a frequent complication in pediatric cardiac surgery, leading to adverse outcomes.
  • The predictive role of coagulation testing for bleeding risk in this population remains uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive accuracy of prospective coagulation testing versus clinical characteristics alone for excessive bleeding during and after pediatric cardiac surgery.

Main Methods:

  • A single-center, prospective cohort study involving 225 children undergoing cardiac surgery.
  • Coagulation testing was performed at anesthetic induction and post-cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • Clinical Concern about Bleeding (CCB) was the primary outcome, defined by prohemostatic treatment or high chest drain volume.

Main Results:

  • CCB occurred in 12% during and 30% after surgery.
  • Clinical characteristics alone predicted CCB with c-statistics of 0.64 (during) and 0.74 (after).
  • Incorporating coagulation tests improved prediction (c-statistics 0.79 and 0.80) but with only a marginal increase in correct classification (0.9% and 0.4%).

Conclusions:

  • Prospective coagulation testing offers a marginal improvement in predicting bleeding concerns in pediatric cardiac surgery.
  • The clinical utility of adding coagulation testing to predictive models is limited when compared to clinical factors alone.