Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

06:28
Screening Cotton Genotypes for Reniform Nematode Resistance
Published on: May 2, 2019
11.4K
Resistance Gene Pyramiding and Rotation to Combat Widespread Soybean Cyst Nematode Virulence
Clinton Meinhardt1, Amanda Howland1, Mark Ellersieck2
1Division of Plant Sciences and Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.
Plant Disease
|January 15, 2021
Summary
Rotating soybean resistance genes is key to managing soybean cyst nematode (SCN). A rotation combining PI 437654 (rhg1-a/Rhg4) with PI 88788 (rhg1-b) and other resistance sources effectively controlled SCN.
Area of Science:
- Plant Pathology and Nematology
- Agricultural Science
- Genetics and Breeding
Background:
- Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) causes significant annual yield losses exceeding $1 billion in the U.S.
- Current management relies heavily on SCN-resistant soybean cultivars, primarily using resistance genes from PI 88788 (rhg1-b) and PI 548402 (rhg1-a/Rhg4).
- Overreliance on PI 88788 rhg1-b has led to SCN populations adapting and overcoming this resistance, necessitating new management strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of rotating soybean lines with different combinations of resistance genes against virulent SCN populations.
- To identify optimal resistance gene rotation strategies for managing SCN and preventing further adaptation to resistant cultivars.
- To provide guidance for sustainable SCN resistance management plans.
Main Methods:
- Eight SCN populations were developed through continuous selection on single resistance sources or rotations of soybean lines with pyramided resistance genes.
- Resistance sources included alleles from PI 88788 (rhg1-b), PI 437654 (rhg1-a/Rhg4), PI 468916 (cqSCN-006/007), and PI 567516C (Chr10).
- SCN population densities were monitored over eight generations, followed by HG type tests to assess population shifts and virulence.
Main Results:
- Continuous use of rhg1-b or cqSCN-006/007 showed limited effectiveness in reducing SCN type 1.2.5.7 population density.
- Rotation with rhg1-a/Rhg4 resistance significantly reduced SCN population density but selected for broader virulence (HG type 1.2.3.5.6.7).
- A rotation combining rhg1-a/Rhg4 with a pyramid of rhg1-b/cqSCN-006/007/Chr10 was most effective in reducing population density and minimizing selection pressure.
Conclusions:
- Strategic rotation of diverse SCN resistance genes is crucial for effective nematode management.
- The combination of PI 437654 (rhg1-a/Rhg4) with a multi-gene pyramid (rhg1-b/006/007/Chr10) offers a promising strategy to combat widespread SCN virulence.
- Implementing such rotation plans can help sustain the durability of SCN resistance genes and mitigate future SCN adaptation.

