Related Experiment Videos
Hemodynamic changes during acetate dialysis, bicarbonate dialysis and hemofiltration
R Vagge1, F Cavatorta, C Queirolo
1Hemodialysis Service, Hospital of Lavagna, Genova, Italy.
Blood Purification
|January 1, 1988
Summary
Acetate dialysis improved cardiac index (CI) and decreased resistance index (RI), while bicarbonate dialysis and hemofiltration increased RI. Buffer choice impacts hemodynamic responses during fluid removal in uremic patients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Renal Replacement Therapy
Background:
- Uremic patients undergoing dialysis experience significant hemodynamic changes.
- Different dialysis modalities may elicit distinct cardiovascular responses.
- Understanding these responses is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the hemodynamic effects of acetate dialysis, bicarbonate dialysis, and hemofiltration in uremic patients.
- To investigate the role of buffer composition and transport mechanism on cardiovascular parameters.
Main Methods:
- Hemodynamic parameters including cardiac index (CI) and resistance index (RI) were monitored using a thermistor Swan-Ganz catheter.
- Twenty uremic patients were divided into three groups: acetate dialysis (n=6), bicarbonate dialysis (n=8), and hemofiltration (n=6).
- Data were collected during each dialytic procedure.
Main Results:
- Acetate dialysis showed a +4.8% increase in CI and a -16.5% decrease in RI.
- Bicarbonate dialysis resulted in an initial CI fall, followed by stabilization, and an +8.6% increase in RI.
- Hemofiltration led to a continuous decrease in CI and an +12.9% increase in RI.
Conclusions:
- The buffer used significantly influences hemodynamic responses during diffusive transport (dialysis) for fluid removal.
- Convective transport (hemofiltration) leads to increased vascular resistance, irrespective of acetate presence.
- Careful consideration of dialysis buffer and modality is essential for optimizing hemodynamic stability in uremic patients.