Comparing and modeling absolute auditory thresholds in an alternative-forced-choice and a yes-no procedure

Detecting sounds in quiet is arguably the simplest task performed by an auditory system, but the underlying mechanisms are still a matter of debate. Threshold stimulus levels depend not only on the physical properties of the sounds to be detected but also on the experimental procedure used to measure them. Here, thresholds of human subjects were measured for sounds consisting of different numbers of bursts using both an alternative-forced-choice and a yes-no procedure in the same experimental sessions. Thresholds measured with the yes-no procedure were typically higher than thresholds measured with the alternative-forced choice procedure. The difference between the two thresholds decreased as stimulus duration increased. It also varied between subjects and varied with the probability of false alarms in the yes-no procedure. It is shown that a previously proposed model of detection (Heil et al., Hear Res 2017) can account for these findings better than other models. It can also account for the shapes of the psychometric functions. The model is consistent with basic concepts of signal detection theory but is based on a decision variable that follows Poisson statistics. It also differs from other models of detection with respect to the transformation of the stimulus into the decision variable. The findings in this study further support the model.