Arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament repair alone versus arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament repair with reinforcement by inferior extensor retinaculum
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025
The Modified Single-working Portal Technique Using Lasso-loop Stitch with Needle for Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair
Published on: August 8, 2025
Yuji Samejima1,2, Ryota Inokuchi3,4, Kosui Iwashita3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ohashi), School of Medicine, Toho University, 2-22-36 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8515, Japan.
Purpose:
This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and postoperative activities of arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament (ALL) repair alone with arthroscopic ALL repair and reinforcement by the inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) for chronic ankle instability (CAI).
Materials And Methods:
All patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for CAI between 2017 and 2019 were evaluated. The Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) scale and self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q), and duration between the surgery and walking without any support, jogging, and complete return to sports were evaluated and compared. The exclusion criteria were (1) follow-up period of < 1 year after surgery, (2) the presence of associated ankle lesions requiring treatment during the same operative procedure, including patients with subfibular ossicle bigger than 5 mm on radiographs, chondral or osteochondral defect, bony impingement, deltoid ligament tear, fibular tendon pathology, or posterior ankle impingement, and (3) patients who underwent revision surgery.
Results:
We identified 126 patients who underwent surgery for CAI and subsequently excluded 36 patients on account of a short follow-up period (< 1 year), additional surgery, and previous surgery. The remaining 90 eligible patients included arthroscopic ALL repair alone (group A, n = 44) and arthroscopic ALL repair with reinforcement by the inferior extensor retinaculum (group G, n = 46) groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative activities nor in the preoperative or postoperative JSSF scale and SAFE-Q between the two groups. However, significant differences were seen in the mean surgical time (15.5 ± 8.1 vs 20.1 ± 7.6, P = 0.013).
Conclusion:
This study showed no difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. However, arthroscopic ALL repair with reinforcement by IER resulted in a longer surgical time than arthroscopic ALL repair alone.
Level Of Evidence:
Retrospective comparative study, level III.
