Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Model-based comorbidity clusters in patients with heart failure: association with clinical outcomes and healthcare
Claudia Gulea1,2, Rosita Zakeri3,4, Jennifer K Quint5,6,4
1Department of Population Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. c.gulea18@imperial.ac.uk.
Insights
Heart failure (HF) patient groups based on comorbidities show varied outcomes. The metabolic-vascular group faces the highest risk of hospitalization and death, highlighting the need for better comorbidity management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Public Health
Background:
- Current heart failure (HF) classifications do not adequately reflect the impact of comorbidities on patient outcomes.
- Understanding the complex interplay of comorbidities is crucial for improving HF management and prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To classify heart failure (HF) patients into distinct groups based on patterns of comorbidities.
- To investigate the association between these identified comorbidity groups and key outcomes such as hospital admission and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to administrative claims data of 318,384 HF patients in the USA (2008-2018).
- Twelve common comorbidities were analyzed to identify distinct patient clusters.
- Cox regression and negative binomial regression were used to assess associations with hospital admission, mortality, and healthcare utilization.
Main Results:
- Five distinct comorbidity clusters were identified: low-burden, metabolic-vascular, anemic, ischemic, and metabolic.
- The metabolic-vascular group exhibited the highest risk for hospital admission (HR 2.21) and mortality (HR 1.87) compared to the low-burden group.
- The anemic group showed increased outpatient visits (IRR 2.11), while metabolic-vascular and ischemic groups had higher admission rates and healthcare costs.
Conclusions:
- Latent class analysis (LCA) is a feasible method for classifying heart failure (HF) patients based solely on their comorbidity profiles.
- These findings support the development of multidimensional approaches to comorbidity management in HF.
- Targeted management strategies for specific comorbidity clusters may reduce hospital admission and mortality risks in heart failure patients.
Background:
Comorbidities affect outcomes in heart failure (HF), but are not reflected in current HF classification. The aim of this study is to characterize HF groups that account for higher-order interactions between comorbidities and to investigate the association between comorbidity groups and outcomes.
Methods:
Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on 12 comorbidities from patients with HF identified from administrative claims data in the USA (OptumLabs Data Warehouse®) between 2008 and 2018. Associations with admission to hospital and mortality were assessed with Cox regression. Negative binomial regression was used to examine rates of healthcare use.
Results:
In a population of 318,384 individuals, we identified five comorbidity clusters, named according to their dominant features: low-burden, metabolic-vascular, anemic, ischemic, and metabolic. Compared to the low-burden group (minimal comorbidities), patients in the metabolic-vascular group (exhibiting a pattern of diabetes, obesity, and vascular disease) had the worst prognosis for admission (HR 2.21, 95% CI 2.17-2.25) and death (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.74-2.01), followed by the ischemic, anemic, and metabolic groups. The anemic group experienced an intermediate risk of admission (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.44-1.54) and death (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30-1.64). Healthcare use also varied: the anemic group had the highest rate of outpatient visits, compared to the low-burden group (IRR 2.11, 95% CI 2.06-2.16); the metabolic-vascular and ischemic groups had the highest rate of admissions (IRR 2.11, 95% CI 2.08-2.15, and 2.11, 95% CI 2.07-2.15) and healthcare costs.
Conclusions:
These data demonstrate the feasibility of using LCA to classify HF based on comorbidities alone and should encourage investigation of multidimensional approaches in comorbidity management to reduce admission and mortality risk among patients with HF.
More Related Videos
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure I: Introduction