Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Comparison of second appropriate defibrillator therapy occurrence in patients implanted for primary prevention and
Yasuhito Kotake1, Ryobun Yasuoka1, Motohide Tanaka1
1Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Insights
Primary prevention patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) face a similar risk of a second appropriate therapy (app-Tx) as secondary prevention patients. This highlights the need for careful monitoring after the first event in all patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death generally have a lower incidence of appropriate therapy (app-Tx) compared to those receiving it for secondary prevention.
- Detailed analysis of the occurrence of a second app-Tx following an initial event is lacking, particularly when comparing primary and secondary prevention groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of a second appropriate ICD therapy (app-Tx) between patients receiving an ICD for primary versus secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
- To investigate if baseline structural heart disease influences the risk of a second app-Tx in primary versus secondary prevention patients.
Main Methods:
- Sub-analysis of the prospective, observational Nippon Storm Study involving 985 patients with structural heart disease (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50%).
- Selection of 251 patients who experienced at least one appropriate ICD therapy.
- Comparison of the occurrence of a second app-Tx between primary prevention (n=116) and secondary prevention (n=135) patient groups.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of a second app-Tx between primary and secondary prevention patients at 1 year (59% vs. 59%) and 3 years (79% vs. 75%).
- Evaluation of second app-Tx incidence based on basal structural disease (ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) also revealed no significant difference between primary and secondary prevention groups.
Conclusions:
- Once a first appropriate ICD therapy occurs, primary prevention patients are at a high risk for subsequent ventricular arrhythmias.
- The incidence of a second app-Tx is comparable between primary and secondary prevention patients, suggesting similar risk profiles post-initial event.
- This finding underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring and risk stratification for all patients experiencing an appropriate ICD therapy, regardless of their initial prevention indication.
Background:
Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) use for primary prevention (primary prevention patients) of sudden cardiac death have lower incidence of appropriate ICD therapy (app-Tx) compared with those with ICD use for secondary prevention (secondary prevention patients). However, detail analysis of a second app-Tx after a first app-Tx is still lacking.
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the incidence of a second app-Tx in primary vs secondary prevention patients.
Methods:
We conducted sub-analysis of the Nippon Storm Study, which was a prospective, observational study involving 985 patients with structural heart disease (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50%). Of these, we selected 251 patients (62 ± 14 years old, 82% men) who experienced at least one appropriate ICD therapy, and compared occurrence of a second app-Tx between primary (n = 116) and secondary (n = 135) prevention patients.
Results:
There was no significant difference in the incidence of a second app-Tx between primary and secondary prevention patients (the cumulative incidence for a second app-Tx was 59% at 1 year and 79% at 3 years in primary prevention patients vs the cumulative incidence for the second app-Tx was 59% at 1 year and 75% at 3 years in secondary prevention patients).Additionally, we evaluated the incidence of a second app-Tx according to basal structural disease (ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) and found no significant difference between primary and secondary prevention patients.
Conclusion:
Once app-Tx occurs, primary prevention patients acquire the high risk of subsequent ventricular arrhythmias because there is a comparable incidence of a second app-Tx in secondary prevention patients.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

