Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018
Harmonization of radiomic feature distributions: impact on classification of hepatic tissue in CT imaging
Hubert Beaumont1, Antoine Iannessi2, Anne-Sophie Bertrand3
1Median Technologies, 06560, Valbonne, France. Hubert.beaumont@mediantechnologies.com.
Objectives:
Following the craze for radiomic features (RF), their lack of reliability raised the question of the generalizability of classification models. Inter-site harmonization of images therefore becomes a central issue. We compared RF harmonization processing designed to detect liver diseases in CT images.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 76 multi-center portal CT series of non-diseased (NDL) and diseased liver (DL) patients. In each series, we positioned volumes of interest in spleen and liver, then extracted 9 RF (histogram and texture). We evaluated two RF harmonization approaches. First, in each series, we computed the Z-score of liver measurements based on those computed in the spleen. Second, we evaluated the ComBat method according to each imaging center; parameters were computed in the spleen and applied to the liver. We compared RF distributions and classification performances before/after harmonization. We classified NDL versus spleen and versus DL tissues.
Results:
The RF distributions were all different between liver and spleen (p < 0.05). The Z-score harmonization outperformed for the detection of liver versus spleen: AUC = 93.1% (p < 0.001). For the detection of DL versus NDL, in a case/control setting, we found no differences between the harmonizations: mean AUC = 73.6% (p = 0.49). Using the whole datasets, the performances were improved using ComBat (p = 0.05) AUC = 82.4% and degraded with Z-score AUC = 67.4% (p = 0.008).
Conclusions:
Data harmonization requires to first focus on data structuring to not degrade the performances of subsequent classifications. Liver tissue classification after harmonization of spleen-based RF is a promising strategy for improving the detection of DL tissue.
Key Points:
• Variability of acquisition parameter makes radiomics of CT features non-reproducible. • Data harmonization can help circumvent the inter-site variability of acquisition protocols. • Inter-site harmonization must be carefully implemented and requires designing consistent data sets.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
05:37Author Spotlight: A Non-Invasive Tool to Assess and Differentiate Fat Patterns in Liver Using 3D Dixon MRI
Published on: October 20, 2023