Using qualitative descriptors of chronic liver disease on MRI: A practice prone to error

Assess accuracy of qualitative descriptors for chronic liver disease (CLD) in radiology reports compared to histopathological staging.

Database search for patients with hepatitis B/C (HBV/HCV) CLD, abdominal MRI during 2009-2016, and liver biopsy within 6 months of MRI or prior biopsy showing cirrhosis. Reports reviewed for mention of CLD and associated descriptors. Findings stratified into categories: normal/no mention of CLD; changes of CLD without qualitative descriptor; mild/early; moderate; severe/advanced and cirrhosis. Descriptive ranges categorized to the lesser degree. Percent concordance/discordance of descriptors and Scheuer stage (F0-F4), false positive (FP), false negative (FN) and sensitivity/specificity calculated.

309 patients, median age 54 (24-74). 91% had HCV (282/309), 7% HBV and 2% both HBV/HCV. Biopsy showed 19% without CLD/F0; 8% F1, 15% F2, 15% F3 and 43% F4. 188 MRI reports (61%) stated CLD was present; however, 16 had no fibrosis on histopathology (9% FP). 39% (121/309) did not mention or stated no CLD; however, 78 had CLD on histopathology (64% FN). 59% of FN were early fibrosis (F1 or F2), 27% F3 and 11% F4. Overall sensitivity and specificity was 69% and 73%, respectively. 77% (145/188) of MRI reports used a descriptive qualifier when describing CLD. 10% were concordant with exact histopathology staging. Of discordant reports, 90% identified CLD but under-called severity.

Abdominal radiologists can detect CLD on MRI but degree of CLD is often under-called compared to histopathology suggesting radiologists should refrain from qualitative descriptors in assessing CLD on MRI and reaffirms the need for quantitative imaging.