Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Impaired coronary flow velocity reserve is associated with cardiovascular risk factors but not with angina symptoms
Kira Bang Bove1, Marie M Michelsen2, Jakob Schroder2
1Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark kirabove@gmail.com.
Insights
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is more common in women with angina, but this difference disappears when accounting for cardiovascular risk factors. Standard tests do not identify CMD in these patients, questioning current definitions of microvascular angina.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is hypothesized to cause angina in women without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Evidence linking angina pectoris to CMD is limited, necessitating further investigation.
- Understanding CMD is crucial for diagnosing and managing chest pain in women.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare CMD prevalence in women with angina versus asymptomatic women.
- To evaluate the relationship between CMD, angina characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, and stress test results.
- To investigate the diagnostic utility of current methods for identifying CMD in women with angina and non-obstructive CAD.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 1684 women with angina and <50% coronary artery stenosis, compared to 102 asymptomatic controls.
- Coronary microvascular function assessed using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) via transthoracic Doppler stress echocardiography; CFVR < 2 defined as CMD.
- Standardized angina questionnaires and health records for stress testing results were utilized.
Main Results:
- Median CFVR was lower in symptomatic women (2.33) than asymptomatic women (2.60), with CMD found in 25% vs 19% respectively.
- After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, smoking, heart rate), the difference in CFVR between groups was no longer significant (p=0.213).
- No significant associations were found between CFVR and angina characteristics, symptom burden, or stress test outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Impaired CFVR is more prevalent in symptomatic women but is associated with cardiovascular risk factors, not solely angina.
- Standard stress tests and symptom characteristics do not reliably identify women with impaired CFVR among those with angina and non-obstructive CAD.
- Current definitions of microvascular angina may need re-evaluation given these findings.
Objectives:
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is considered to cause angina pectoris in a large proportion of women with no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, data supporting a relation between angina pectoris and CMD are limited. We compared CMD in women with angina with asymptomatic women and evaluated the relation between presence of CMD, angina characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors and results of stress testing.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional study, we included 1684 women with angina and <50% coronary artery stenosis on invasive angiography. Asymptomatic women from the community-based Copenhagen City Heart Study served as reference group (n=102). Coronary microvascular function was determined by coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) assessed by transthoracic Doppler stress echocardiography. CFVR < 2 was defined as CMD. Symptoms were obtained from standardised angina questionnaires and results of stress testing from health records.
Results:
Median CFVR was 2.33 (IQR 2.00-2.75) in symptomatic women versus 2.60 (2.19-2.95) in asymptomatic (p=0.007). CFVR <2 was found in 25% of symptomatic and in 19% of asymptomatic women. Symptomatic women had a greater risk factor burden. After adjusting for age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking and heart rate the difference in CFVR between groups disappeared (p=0.213). We found no associations between CFVR and angina characteristics, symptom burden or results from stress testing.
Conclusions:
Impaired CFVR is more prevalent in symptomatic than in asymptomatic women and related to the cardiovascular risk factors hypertension, diabetes, smoking and increased heart rate. Neither a positive bicycle test, single photon emission CT stress test nor chest pain characteristics identify women with impaired CFVR among women with angina and no obstructive CAD. Results may question the concept of microvascular angina as currently defined.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Angina II: Classification
Vascular Resistance
The primary determinants of vascular resistance are vessel diameter, blood viscosity, and vessel length. Among these, vessel diameter plays the most significant role due to the fourth power relationship described by...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

