Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Published on: March 14, 2019
RAS Amplification as a Negative Predictor of Benefit from Anti-EGFR-Containing Therapy Regimens in Metastatic
Alexa B Schrock1, Jessica K Lee1, Jaideep Sandhu2
1Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Background:
RAS short variant (SV) mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with lack of benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (EGFRmAb). However, the clinical implications for RAS amplification (RASa) as a biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy in CRC remain ill defined.
Methods:
Genomic analysis was performed using the Foundation Medicine (FM) comprehensive genomic profiling database of 37,233 CRC cases. Clinical outcomes were assessed using two independent cohorts: the City of Hope (COH) cohort of 338 patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) and the Flatiron Health-FM real-world clinicogenomic database (CGDB) of 3,904 patients with mCRC.
Results:
RASa was detected in 1.6% (614/37,233) of primarily mCRC. RASa 6-9 (n = 241, 39%), 10-19 (n = 165, 27%), and ≥ 20 (n = 209, 34%) copy number subsets had co-RAS SV/BRAF V600E in 63%/3%, 31%/0.6%, and 4.8%/0% of cases, respectively. In the COH cohort, six patients with RASa (13-54 copies) received EGFRmAb, four of six had progressive disease, two had stable disease, and median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) was 2.5 months. Of the CGDB EGFRmAb-treated patients, those with RASa (n = 9) had median TTD of 4.7 months and overall survival (OS) of 11.4 months, those with RAS SV (n = 101) had median TTD and OS of 5.3 and 9.4 months, and those with RAS/BRAF wild-type (n = 608) had median TTD and OS of 7.6 and 13.7 months.
Conclusion:
Patients with RASa without RAS mutations (1.1% of mCRC) may have poor outcomes on EGFRmAb, although numbers herein were small, and interpretation is confounded by combination chemotherapy. Larger independent studies are warranted to determine if RASa, including degree of amplification, may act similarly to RAS mutation as a resistance mechanism to EGFRmAb therapies.
Implications For Practice:
Genomic data suggest that RAS amplification occurs as the sole RAS/RAF alteration in >1% of colorectal cancer cases and that degree of amplification inversely correlates with co-occurring MAPK pathway alterations. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that RAS amplification may function similarly to RAS mutation as a negative predictor of benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies in colorectal cancer. More clinical data are needed, and comprehensive genomic profiling, including detection of RAS amplification, should be used in trial design to inform therapy selection.
Insights
RAS amplification (RASa) in colorectal cancer (CRC) may predict poor outcomes with anti-EGFR therapy, similar to RAS mutations. Further research is needed to confirm RASa as a resistance biomarker in CRC treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- RAS short variant (SV) mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) predict lack of benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (EGFRmAbs).
- The role of RAS amplification (RASa) as a biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy in CRC is not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical implications of RAS amplification (RASa) as a biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC).
- To determine if RASa functions similarly to RAS mutations in predicting treatment response to EGFRmAbs in CRC.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive genomic profiling of 37,233 CRC cases using the Foundation Medicine database.
- Clinical outcome assessment in two independent cohorts: City of Hope (338 metastatic CRC patients) and Flatiron Health-FM real-world clinicogenomic database (3,904 metastatic CRC patients).
Main Results:
- RAS amplification (RASa) was detected in 1.6% of CRC cases, with varying copy numbers and co-occurring mutations.
- In real-world cohorts, patients with RASa treated with EGFRmAbs showed shorter time to treatment discontinuation and overall survival compared to RAS/BRAF wild-type patients.
- RASa patients had poorer outcomes on EGFRmAb therapy, though numbers were small and confounded by combination chemotherapy.
Conclusions:
- RAS amplification (RASa) without RAS mutations may be associated with poor outcomes on EGFRmAb therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
- RASa might act as a resistance mechanism to EGFRmAb therapies, similar to RAS mutations.
- Larger independent studies are warranted to confirm RASa as a predictive biomarker, and comprehensive genomic profiling should include RAS amplification detection for therapy selection.
More Related Videos
09:29Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...