Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers
Published on: August 20, 2014
Kink-antikink collisions in a weakly interacting ϕ^{4} model
C Adam1, K Oles2, T Romanczukiewicz2
1Departamento de Física de Partículas, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela and Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxias, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Abstract:
Kink-antikink scattering in nonintegrable field theories like ϕ^{4} theory is still rather poorly understood beyond brute-force numerical calculations, even after several decades of investigation. Recently, however, some progress has been made based on the introduction of certain self-dual background fields in these field theories which imply both the existence of static kink-antikink solutions of the Bogomol'nyi type and the possibility of an adiabatic scattering (moduli space approximation). Here we continue and generalize these investigations by introducing a one-parameter family of models interpolating between the Bogomol'nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield (BPS) model with the self-dual background field and the original ϕ^{4} theory. More concretely, we study kink-antikink scattering in a parameter range between the limit of no static force (BPS limit) and the regime where the static interaction between kink and antikink is small (non-BPS regime). This allows us to study the impact of the strength of the intersoliton static force on the soliton dynamics. In particular, we analyze how the transition of a bound mode through the mass threshold affects the soliton dynamics in a generic process, i.e., when a static intersoliton force shows up. We show that the thin, precisely localized spectral wall which forms in the limit of no static force broadens in a well-defined manner when a static force is included, giving rise to what we call a thick spectral wall. This phenomenon results from the appearance of a stationary saddle point solution where the acceleration of the solitons owing to the attractive force is compensated by the dynamics of the sufficiently excited mode. Thus, this barrier shows up before the mode crosses the mass threshold.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Disassembly of Intermediate Filaments
Keratin proteins, found at the cell periphery near cell junctions, undergo a cycle of assembly and disassembly. In Type...
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Reduced Mass Coordinates: Isolated Two-body Problem

