Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity01:17

Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity

3.7K
In 1905, Albert Einstein published his special theory of relativity. According to this theory, no matter in the universe can attain a speed greater than the speed of light in a vacuum, which thus serves as the speed limit of the universe.
This has been verified in many experiments. However, space and time are no longer absolute. Two observers moving relative to one another do not agree on the length of objects or the passage of time. The mechanics of objects based on Newton's laws of...
3.7K
Principle of Equivalence01:18

Principle of Equivalence

2.4K
According to Albert Einstein (1897-1955), free-falling and feeling weightless are intrinsically linked. If a person were in free-fall under gravity, for example, diving towards the Earth from an airplane, they would feel completely weightless. Similarly, a person descending in a lift may feel partially weightless. Broadly speaking, it is assumed that an object in a uniform gravitational field and an object undergoing constant acceleration in the absence of gravity are under the same...
2.4K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

30.1K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
30.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

926
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
926
Schwarzschild Radius and Event Horizon01:21

Schwarzschild Radius and Event Horizon

2.4K
No object with a finite mass can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. This fact has an interesting consequence in the domain of extremely high gravitational fields.
The minimum speed required to launch a projectile from the surface of an object to which it is gravitationally bound so that it eventually escapes the object’s gravitational field is called the escape velocity. The escape velocity is independent of the mass of the object. Merging the idea of escape...
2.4K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

780
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
780

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub's Question and Fuchs' Desideratum. <i>Entropy</i> 2019, <i>21</i>, 692.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

No Preferred Reference Frame at the Foundation of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Re-Thinking the World with Neutral Monism:Removing the Boundaries Between Mind, Matter, and Spacetime.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub's Question and Fuchs' Desideratum.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Answering Mermin's challenge with conservation per no preferred reference frame.

Scientific reports·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.4K

Beyond Causal Explanation: Einstein's Principle Not Reichenbach's.

Michael Silberstein1,2, William Mark Stuckey3, Timothy McDevitt4

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA 17022, USA.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 20, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study offers a non-causal, realist explanation for quantum phenomena like EPR correlations and contextuality, consistent with spacetime structure. It rejects retrocausal models and Reichenbach's Principle, proposing a new physical principle for quantum mechanics.

Keywords:
EPR correlationsReichenbach’s PrincipleTsirelson boundcausal modellingcontextualitylocalityno preferred reference frameno-signallingprinciple explanationquantum information theoryrealist psi-epistemicreconstructions of quantum mechanicsrelativity principleretrocausality

More Related Videos

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.1K
A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.4K
Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.1K
A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Mechanics
  • Foundations of Physics
  • Quantum Information Theory

Background:

  • EPR correlations, contextuality, no-signalling, and the Tsirelson bound present interpretational challenges in quantum mechanics.
  • Existing explanations often rely on causal or retrocausal assumptions, which are debated.
  • Reichenbach's Principle and the search for a fundamental physical principle in quantum information theory guide current research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a local, realist, and fully non-causal principle-based explanation for key quantum mechanical phenomena.
  • To critique and offer an alternative to retrocausal interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  • To identify and elaborate on the physical principle underpinning quantum information theory's reconstructions of quantum mechanics.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a non-causal principle-based account of quantum mechanics.
  • Analysis of EPR correlations, contextuality, no-signalling, and the Tsirelson bound within this framework.
  • Comparison with retrocausal accounts and Reichenbach's Principle.

Main Results:

  • A local, realist, and non-causal explanation for EPR correlations, contextuality, no-signalling, and the Tsirelson bound is presented.
  • The proposed account is consistent with the causal structure of Minkowski spacetime.
  • Retrocausal accounts are shown to be problematic due to their reliance on fundamental causal explanations.

Conclusions:

  • The study introduces a novel principle-based framework for understanding quantum mechanics, distinct from retrocausal approaches.
  • This framework offers a complete rejection of Reichenbach's Principle, proposing a new foundational physical principle.
  • The account is demonstrated to be both fully realist and psi-epistemic, addressing key interpretational aspects.