A clinical score for predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Yuki Kimura1, Takahiro Okumura1, Ryota Morimoto1
1Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Insights
A new scoring system predicts left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. This tool identifies patients likely to improve, aiding long-term treatment strategies for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
- Clinical Prediction Models
Background:
- Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) is a key prognostic indicator in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
- Accurate prediction of LVRR is crucial for developing effective long-term treatment strategies in DCM patients.
- Existing methods for LVRR prediction may lack universal applicability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical predictors of LVRR in patients diagnosed with DCM.
- To develop and validate a practical scoring system for predicting LVRR in DCM patients.
- To establish a tool applicable across various clinical institutions.
Main Methods:
- 131 DCM patients were enrolled, with clinical data and echocardiographic parameters assessed.
- LVRR was defined by specific increases in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and decreases in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) over one year.
- Multivariate analysis identified independent predictors: hypertension, no family history of DCM, symptom duration <90 days, LVEF <35%, and QRS duration <116 ms.
Main Results:
- 34% of patients achieved LVRR within one year.
- A scoring system was developed based on five independent predictors, demonstrating strong correlation with LVRR rates (0-100% across score ranges).
- The LVRR predicting score (>5) showed high accuracy (AUC: 0.89) and outperformed other markers like late gadolinium enhancement.
Conclusions:
- A validated LVRR predicting score incorporating five clinical factors effectively stratifies LVRR risk in DCM patients.
- This score serves as a valuable, easily implementable clinical tool for predicting LVRR in DCM.
- The developed scoring system offers a standardized approach to LVRR prediction, enhancing clinical decision-making.
Aims:
Left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) is a well-established predictor of a good prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The prediction of LVRR is important when developing a long-term treatment strategy. This study aimed to assess the clinical predictors of LVRR and establish a scoring system for predicting LVRR in patients with DCM that can be used at any institution.
Methods And Results:
We consecutively enrolled 131 patients with DCM and assessed the clinical predictors of LVRR. LVRR was defined as an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from ≥10% to a final value of >35%, accompanied by a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥ 10% on echocardiography at 1 ± 0.5 years after a diagnosis of DCM. The mean patient age was 50.1 ± 11.9 years. The mean LVEF was 32.2 ± 9.5%, and the mean LVEDD was 64.1 ± 12.5 mm at diagnosis. LVRR was observed in 45 patients (34%) at 1 ± 0.5 years. In a multivariate analysis, hypertension [odds ratio (OR): 6.86; P = 0.002], no family history of DCM (OR: 10.45; P = 0.037), symptom duration <90 days (OR: 6.72; P < 0.001), LVEF <35% (OR: 13.66; P < 0.0001), and QRS duration <116 ms (OR: 5.94; P = 0.005) were found to be independent predictors of LVRR. We scored the five independent predictors according to the ORs (1 point, 2 points, 1 point, 2 points, and 1 point, respectively), and the total LVRR predicting score was calculated by adding these scores. The LVRR rate was stratified by the LVRR predicting score (0-2 points: 0%; 3 points: 6.7%; 4 points: 17.4%; 5 points: 48.2%; 6 points: 79.2%; and 7 points: 100%). The cut-off value of the LVRR predicting score was >5 in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve: 0.89; P < 0.0001; sensitivity: 87%; specificity: 78%). An LVRR predicting score of >5 was an independent predictor compared with the presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance or the severity of fibrosis on endomyocardial biopsy (OR: 11.79; 95% confidence interval: 2.40-58.00; P = 0.002).
Conclusions:
The LVRR predicting score using five predictors including hypertension, no family history of DCM, symptom duration <90 days, LVEF <35%, and QRS duration <116 ms can stratify the LVRR rate in patients with DCM. The LVRR predicting score may be a useful clinical tool that can be used easily at any institution.
More Related Videos
07:11Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT