Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy01:25

Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy

325
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique that provides crucial insights into the body's physiological functions at a molecular level. It is an indispensable resource for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring various illnesses, notably cancer, neurological disorders, and cardiovascular conditions.
Fundamental Principles of PET
325
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

7.6K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Establishing discard criteria for lead aprons using deep learning-based quantification of defect area on X-ray fluoroscopic video.

Radiological physics and technology·2026
Same author

Validation of Simplified Renal Dosimetry Protocols for <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE Therapy Using the IDAC-dose Software.

Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy·2026
Same author

Response to Comment on "Machine learning model for predicting interfraction motion of the seminal vesicles in prostate cancer radiotherapy".

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Comparison of three arm-positioning techniques for minimizing motion artifacts in breast magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective volunteer study.

Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)·2026
Same author

Improved patient models for simulation of clinically realistic <sup>68</sup>Ga-SSTR PET and <sup>177</sup>Lu-PRRT SPECT studies.

EJNMMI physics·2026
Same author

[A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Large Language Models on the Japanese National Examination for Radiological Technologists].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.5K

[Validation of Simulation Codes for Nuclear Imaging Using Digital Phantoms].

Koichi Okuda1, Hiroki Nosaka2, Toshimune Ito3

  • 1Department of Physics, Kanazawa Medical University.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi
|January 21, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study validated simulation codes for SPECT imaging using phantoms. While simulated FWHM and recovery coefficients closely matched measurements, noise characteristics in background counts differed between simulations and actual data.

Keywords:
body phantomprominence processorsimulationsimulation of imaging nuclear detectors (SIMIND)sphere phantom

More Related Videos

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
07:59

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol

Published on: September 7, 2018

11.8K
Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning
08:41

Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning

Published on: July 14, 2020

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.5K
Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
07:59

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol

Published on: September 7, 2018

11.8K
Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning
08:41

Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning

Published on: July 14, 2020

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Accurate simulation codes are crucial for quantitative SPECT imaging.
  • Validation against phantom measurements ensures the reliability of simulation tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the SIMIND and Prominence Processor simulation codes against experimental SPECT phantom data.
  • To assess the accuracy of simulated image quality metrics, including FWHM and recovery coefficients.

Main Methods:

  • SPECT simulations using SIMIND and Prominence Processor with 99mTc energy characteristics.
  • Measurements and simulations of a sphere phantom for Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) analysis.
  • Body phantom studies comparing simulated recovery coefficients and background count variation with measured values.

Main Results:

  • Maximum relative errors for FWHM were 3.6% (Prominence Processor) and -10.0% (SIMIND).
  • Maximum relative errors for recovery coefficients were 11.8% (Prominence Processor) and -2.0% (SIMIND).
  • Simulated FWHM and recovery coefficients generally paralleled measured results, but background noise characteristics showed significant differences.

Conclusions:

  • Both SIMIND and Prominence Processor show potential for SPECT simulation validation.
  • Discrepancies in background noise characteristics highlight areas for further refinement in simulation algorithms.
  • The study provides valuable data for optimizing SPECT simulation accuracy in nuclear medicine.