Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hearing01:31

Hearing

55.5K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
55.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multi-feature approach to the classification analysis of auditory event-related fields acquired with MEG.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same author

Brain Segregation and Integration Relate to Word-Finding Abilities in Older and Younger Adults.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Hemispheric difference of adaptation lifetime in human auditory cortex measured with MEG.

Hearing research·2025
Same author

Optimising a computational model of human auditory cortex with an evolutionary algorithm.

Hearing research·2023
Same author

Perspectives on adaptive dynamical systems.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Effect of age on lateralized auditory processing.

Hearing research·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.9K

Why do humans have unique auditory event-related fields? Evidence from computational modeling and MEG experiments.

Aida Hajizadeh1, Artur Matysiak1, André Brechmann2

  • 1Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Research Group Comparative Neuroscience, Magdeburg, Germany.

Psychophysiology
|January 21, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Subject-specific auditory event-related fields (ERFs) measured with magnetoencephalography (MEG) stem from both individual brain anatomy and neural dynamics. This study reveals that variations in auditory cortex structure and function explain differences in brain responses to sound.

Keywords:
ERFMEGN1manatomyauditory cortexcomputational modelingdynamicsevent-related fieldlatencymagnetoencephalography

More Related Videos

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

16.7K
Functional Imaging of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cats using High-field fMRI
10:50

Functional Imaging of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cats using High-field fMRI

Published on: February 19, 2014

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.9K
Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

16.7K
Functional Imaging of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cats using High-field fMRI
10:50

Functional Imaging of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cats using High-field fMRI

Published on: February 19, 2014

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Auditory event-related fields (ERFs) measured via magnetoencephalography (MEG) offer insights into auditory cognition.
  • ERFs exhibit significant inter-subject variability in morphology, despite consistent deflections like P1m, N1m, and P2m.
  • The sources of this subject-specificity in ERFs remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether subject-specific ERFs are primarily due to individual cortical anatomy or also influenced by cortical dynamics.
  • To develop and utilize novel computational tools for dissecting the contributions of anatomy and dynamics to ERF variability.
  • To examine the impact of anatomical and dynamical variations on simulated MEG signals from the auditory cortex.

Main Methods:

  • Combined magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements with computational modeling of the human auditory cortex (core-belt-parabelt structure).
  • Employed a leaky-integrator neuron model to simulate auditory cortex dynamics.
  • Characterized experimental and simulated ERFs by analyzing N1m amplitude, latency, and width, alongside grand-averaged waveforms and their standard deviations.

Main Results:

  • Intersubject variability in auditory event-related fields (ERFs) is explained by both subject-specific auditory cortex anatomy and dynamics.
  • Simulations confirm that individual differences in both structure and function contribute to the observed variability in MEG signals.
  • N1m latency variation is significantly associated with subject-specific neural dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • Both anatomical and dynamical factors of the auditory cortex contribute to the subject-specific nature of auditory event-related fields (ERFs).
  • Subject-specific neural dynamics play a crucial role in the latency variations observed in the N1m component.
  • Findings provide a basis for understanding how learning, plasticity, and sound detection are reflected in auditory ERFs and critically evaluate the utility of grand-averaged ERFs.