Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

07:32
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
1.5K
Micro computed tomography evaluation of Invisalign aligner thickness homogeneity
The Angle Orthodontist
|January 21, 2021
Summary
Invisalign aligner thickness is generally consistent, with minor variations. However, molar regions show a significant difference, with the gingival-lingual edge being thinner, potentially impacting orthodontic treatment predictability.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Technology
Background:
- Invisalign clear aligners are widely used in orthodontic treatment.
- Understanding aligner material properties, such as thickness homogeneity, is crucial for treatment predictability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the thickness homogeneity of Invisalign clear aligners using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
- To identify any significant variations in aligner thickness across different regions and sites.
Main Methods:
- 20 Invisalign aligners were scanned using micro-CT.
- Multiplanar reconstructions were analyzed by a blinded orthodontist.
- Thickness was measured in incisor, canine, and molar regions at various sites (gingival-buccal, buccal, occlusal, lingual, gingival-lingual).
- Statistical analysis, including linear regression and Student's t-tests, was performed.
Main Results:
- Mean aligner thickness varied slightly across regions: incisor (0.582-0.639 mm), canine (0.569-0.644 mm), and molar (0.566-0.634 mm).
- No significant thickness differences were found across regions when stratified by site.
- A significant difference in thickness homogeneity was observed in the molar region (P = .024), with the gingival-lingual edge being thinner than the occlusal aspect.
Conclusions:
- Invisalign aligner thickness exhibits minimal variations.
- A significant thickness difference exists in the molar region, specifically at the gingival-lingual edge.
- This localized thinning in the molar region may contribute to reduced predictability in certain orthodontic tooth movements.

