Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

5.5K
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
5.5K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

4.3K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.3K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

10.0K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.0K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

5.6K
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.6K
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview01:26

Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview

970
Drugs, the chemical agents used in diagnosing, treating, or preventing diseases, undergo a four-phase process of development: pharmaceutic, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic.
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
970
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

3.5K
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interhospital variation in Medicare spending for infections after coronary artery bypass grafting and surgical aortic valve replacement.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of interventions to promote couples-based HIV testing and family health during pregnancy and postpartum in Kenya: a multicentre, couples-based, randomised controlled trial.

The lancet. HIV·2026
Same author

The Potential for a Benefit-Estimating Algorithm to Improve Recommendations for Preventive Services: Comparing Algorithm Recommendations with Those of Primary Care Providers.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

SMARTs with treatment preference: Pragmatic SMART design and methods motivated by STAR*D.

Contemporary clinical trials·2025
Same author

Multicenter Phase II Study of Olaparib and the ATR Inhibitor Ceralasertib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (TRAP).

JCO precision oncology·2025
Same author

A Mobile Health Intervention in Caregivers of Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine Health-Related Quality of Life.

BMC digital health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments
07:46

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Published on: April 30, 2021

5.1K

A modular framework for early-phase seamless oncology trials.

Philip S Boonstra1, Thomas M Braun1, Elizabeth C Chase1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Clinical Trials (London, England)
|January 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a modular framework and R package for designing seamless oncology trials. This approach helps evaluate dose-response and identify safe, efficacious treatments more effectively.

Keywords:
Phase Idose escalationphase IIrecommended phase II dose

More Related Videos

A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis
07:41

A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis

Published on: March 8, 2022

2.7K
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
10:27

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts

Published on: July 25, 2020

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments
07:46

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Published on: April 30, 2021

5.1K
A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis
07:41

A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis

Published on: March 8, 2022

2.7K
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
10:27

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts

Published on: July 25, 2020

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical trial design
  • Oncology research
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Phase I oncology trials increasingly incorporate multiple objectives, including dose estimation and efficacy assessment.
  • Seamless trial designs integrate dose-finding and efficacy evaluation, posing challenges in assessing operating characteristics like probability of identifying acceptable doses.
  • Key challenges include determining the likelihood of finding a safe and effective dose and the average number of patients assigned to such doses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel modular framework for designing and evaluating seamless oncology trials.
  • To address the complexity of modern phase I/II oncology trial designs.
  • To facilitate the rigorous assessment of trial operating characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a modular framework with sequential modules for dose assignment and dose-response evaluation.
  • Incorporated existing phase I/II designs and introduced a new Bayesian isotonic regression module for dose-response assessment.
  • Created a freely available R package, seamlesssim, for numerical estimation of trial operating characteristics via simulation.

Main Results:

  • The seamlesssim R package enables simulation-based estimation of operating characteristics for modular seamless oncology trials.
  • Demonstrated the utility of the framework in evaluating and comparing different candidate trial designs.
  • The framework allows for more rigorous performance assessment and better sample size justification.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed modular design framework and simulator enhance the selection of higher-quality seamless oncology trial designs.
  • Clinical trialists can compare designs, assess performance, and justify sample sizes more effectively.
  • This approach contributes to more efficient and robust oncology drug development.