Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: September 13, 2022
Pessary use in patients diagnosed with short cervix and cervical insufficiency
Dilsad Herkiloglu1, Habibe Ayvacı2, Oya Pekin3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yeni Yuzyil University Private Gaziosmapasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objective:
The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Arabin pessary use in patients with cervical insufficiency or short cervix before the 24th week of gestation and the impact of cervical examination findings prior to pessary application on the outcome in terms of the gestational week.
Materials And Methods:
In our study, among the pregnancies between the 12th and 24th gestational weeks, 60 pregnant women with a preterm delivery history and/or cervical length less than 25 mm were included. Among these 60 patients, 43 of them had a short cervix, 17 of them had cervical insufficiency. Routine medical and obstetric history was obtained. In the vaginal examination, the cervix was evaluated in terms of patency, dilatation, and position. Cervical length, presence of debris, and funneling were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound. After receiving patients' approval a cervical pessary was applied to patients. Pessaries of pregnant women with 37 weeks of gestation were removed. Before reaching the 37th gestation week, pessaries were withdrawn in patients who had ongoing vaginal bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, and preterm contractions unresponsive to tocolytic treatment.
Results:
Thirty-one pregnant women (51.7%) out of 60 pregnant women who underwent pessary, delivered at 37 weeks and below. Delivery rates in the short cervical measurement group and cervical insufficiency group at ≤28 weeks, ≤34 weeks and ≤37 weeks were respectively (n = 21) 34.8% vs 36.3% (p = 0.976), (n = 29) 41.8% vs 64.7% (p = 0.111), (n = 31) 44.2% vs 70.6% (p = 0.888). The presence of cervical funneling before pessary application shows a statistically significant difference in terms of patient's giving birth before or after 28 weeks (p = 0.033). In patients with cervical funneling, there was a significant increase in a birth before 28 weeks. Depending on whether or not patients applying with pain need for tocolysis, it shows the statistically meaningful difference in terms of the patients giving birth before or after 34 weeks (p = 0.001) (OR 7, 61, 95% GA 2.4-24.6). In the group without the need for tocolysis, there is a meaningful increase in birth after 34 weeks.
Conclusions:
Our findings showed that, alongside the defined cervical risk factors, cervical funneling and the need for tocolysis are remarkable prognostic variables in pessary application.
Related Concept Videos
Uterus and Cervix
The uterus is securely anchored within the pelvic cavity by paired broad ligaments on either side. It is further stabilized by three pairs...
Birth Control Methods
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management

