Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Postural Organization of Gait Initiation for Biomechanical Analysis Using Force Platform Recordings
Published on: July 26, 2022
Relation between frontal plane center of mass position stability and foot elevation during obstacle crossing
Momoko Yamagata1, Hiroshige Tateuchi2, Todd Pataky2
1Human Development, Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3-11 Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 657-0011, Japan; Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan; Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 5-3-1 Kojimachi, Chiyodaku, Tokyo 102-0083, Japan.
Abstract:
High foot elevation during obstacle crossing is viewed as a conservative strategy in older adults, but excessive foot elevation may result in large mediolateral center of mass (CoM) displacement. Since an incorrect transfer of CoM can lead to balance loss during locomotion, both appropriate foot elevation and CoM position must be controlled and coordinated by adjusting body segment positions. However, no studies have revealed time profiles of CoM position by coordinated segment movements and the relation of foot elevation with CoM position during obstacle crossing. Twenty-five healthy older adults crossed an obstacle (depth: 1 cm, width: 60 cm, height: 8 cm) during comfortable-speed walking. Synergy indices were calculated during lead- and trail-limb swing using uncontrolled manifold analysis. High synergy index values indicate a strong multi-joint kinematic synergy, or co-fluctuations in segment movements, to control CoM position. The maximum foot heights of the swing limbs were calculated as the maximum vertical distance between the most distal foot point and the ground. In the mediolateral direction, synergy index values during early lead-limb swing were significantly greater than during early trail-limb swing, and in the vertical direction, large synergy index values were found during early- and mid-swing phases. Moreover, maximum trail-foot height was correlated to vertical synergy index during early phase. CoM position was not well controlled by a kinematic synergy during trail-limb swing and the low control of CoM position was observed with great trail-foot height. The results suggest that a conservative strategy with great trail-foot height would not always be helpful for successful obstacle crossing.
More Related Videos
08:24Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
07:52Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Equation of Motion: Center of Mass
Internal forces between any pair of particles manifest as collinear pairs of equal magnitude but opposite directions,...
Center of Mass
The knowledge of the center of mass can also help us to describe and predict the motion of objects. For example, when a ball is thrown...
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Significance of Center of Mass
Center of Mass: Introduction