Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

301
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
301
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

239
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
239

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Balancing the scales: predictors of performance and the long-term impact of a robotic surgery curriculum.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Minimally Invasive Surgery/Robotic Surgery in Small Bowel Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Small Incisions, Big Impact-Robotic Surgery Is Revolutionizing Cancer Care.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Delayed gastric emptying after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: the Transatlantic Robot Pancreas Consortium (TROPANC).

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Impact of Surgical Approach on Post-Pancreatoduodenectomy Bleeding: A Multi-Center Analysis.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Minimally invasive surgery for small-bowel gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors over 5 cm: A safe and feasible approach.

Surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
07:27

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection

Published on: February 7, 2025

771

Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes.

Charles C Vining1, Kinga B Skowron1, Melissa E Hogg2

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Updates in Surgery
|January 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Robotic surgery offers advantages for gastrointestinal procedures, showing similar oncologic outcomes to open surgery. However, standardized training is lacking, necessitating a team approach and improved educational modules to overcome the learning curve.

Keywords:
ColorectalGastricGastrointestinal surgeryLearning curveLiverPancreasRobotic

More Related Videos

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

428
Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
14:45

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

15.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
07:27

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection

Published on: February 7, 2025

771
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

428
Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
14:45

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

15.1K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Robotics
  • Gastrointestinal Oncology

Background:

  • Robotic platform use in gastrointestinal surgery has grown significantly in the last decade.
  • Robotic surgery offers advantages over traditional laparoscopy for complex dissections and reconstructions.
  • While oncologic outcomes are comparable to open surgery, short-term outcomes are improved.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the implementation of robotic platforms for pancreatic, stomach, liver, colon, and rectal surgery.
  • To emphasize the learning curve, educational platforms, and perioperative outcomes associated with robotic gastrointestinal surgery.
  • To highlight the need for standardized training and a multidisciplinary approach.

Main Methods:

  • Review of randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies on robotic gastrointestinal surgery.
  • Analysis of perioperative outcomes, oncologic results, and short-term benefits.
  • Discussion of challenges including the learning curve and current training limitations.

Main Results:

  • Robotic surgery demonstrates equivalent oncologic outcomes to open surgery.
  • Short-term outcomes are generally improved with robotic procedures.
  • Significant variability exists in surgeon experience due to lack of standardized training programs.

Conclusions:

  • Successful implementation of robotic surgery requires a multidisciplinary team and institutional commitment.
  • Development and wider distribution of educational modules are crucial to reduce the learning curve.
  • Further research and standardized training are needed to optimize robotic surgery adoption in gastrointestinal procedures.