Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
Optimized enhanced acceleration selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) for non-gated and non-enhanced MR
Shuhei Shibukawa1, Misaki Saito1, Tetsu Niwa2
1Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Purpose:
Enhanced acceleration selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) was introduced as non-enhanced and non-gated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). This technique has not been applied to hand MRA. The objective of this study was to optimize the eAccASL for MRA of the hands and to investigate the factors for MRA visibility of the hands.
Methods:
Twenty healthy volunteers were examined on a 1.5 T MR system. To evaluate arterial visualization, we compared four different acceleration-encoding (AENC) values (i.e., 0.12, 0.29, 0.58, and 0.87 m/s2). Image quality score regarding the MRA depiction of the proximal artery (range, 0-10), the distal artery (0-5), and venous contamination (0-5) was evaluated by three radiologists. We measured the peak to peak arterial blood flow velocity (Vpp) measured by phase contrast cine MRI and hand temperature as the factors for arterial visualization. Qualitative scores were compared with Friedman's tests. Spearman's correlation of qualitative scores with Vpp and hand temperature was performed to analyze influencing factors.
Results:
For the distal arterial depiction, scores at AENC 0.12 (median, 9.0) and AENC 0.29 (8.0) were significantly better (both P < 0.0001) than those at AENC 0.87 (5.5). For the proximal arterial depiction, scores at AENC 0.12 (2.25) and AENC 0.29 (2.0) were significantly better (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively) than those at AENC 0.87 (1.5). Conversely, venous contamination scores at AENC 0.12 (3.0) and AENC 0.29 (3.0) were significantly worse (both P < 0.0001) than those at AENC 0.87 (4.0). There were significantly negative correlations between venous contamination and Vpp at AENC 0.12 (ρ = -0.56, P = 0.01), and 0.29 (ρ = -0.68, P = 0.001), whereas hand temperatures were not significantly correlated with scores (all P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
eAccASL MRA of the hands was optimized by using low AENC values (0.12-0.29 m/s2). Venous contamination may increase with elevation of arterial blood flow.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Magnetic Resonance Imaging
01:21Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI