Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Competitive Risk Analysis of Prognosis in Patients With Cecum Cancer: A Population-Based Study
Wentao Wu1,2,3, Jin Yang1,3, Daning Li1,3
1Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Background:
The presence of competing risks means that the results obtained using the classic Cox proportional-hazards model for the factors affecting the prognosis of patients diagnosed with cecum cancer (CC) may be biased.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to establish a competitive risk model for patients diagnosed with CC to evaluate the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of patients, and to compare the results with the classical COX proportional risk model.
Methods:
We extracted data on patients diagnosed with CC registered between 2004 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The univariate analysis utilized the cumulative incidence function and Gray's test, while a multivariate analysis was performed using the Fine-Gray, cause-specific (CS), and Cox proportional-hazards models.
Results:
The 54463 eligible patients diagnosed with CC included 24387 who died: 12087 from CC and 12300 from other causes. The multivariate Fine-Gray analysis indicated that significant factors affecting the prognosis of patients diagnosed with CC include: age, race, AJCC stage, differentiation grade, tumor size, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and regional lymph nodes metastasis. Due to the presence of competitive risk events, COX model results could not provide accurate estimates of effects and false-negative results occurred. In addition, COX model misestimated the direction of association between regional lymph node metastasis and cumulative risk of death in patients diagnosed with CC. Competitive risk models tend to be more advantageous when analyzing clinical survival data with multiple endpoints.
Conclusions:
The present study can help clinicians to make better clinical decisions and provide patients diagnosed with CC with better support.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

